These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15020025)

  • 21. A literature review of quantitative indicators to measure the quality of labor and delivery care.
    Tripathi V
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Feb; 132(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 26686027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What factors affect documentation by midwives? A prospective study assessing relationship between length of shift, workload and quality of note keeping.
    Bailey S; Wilson G; Yoong W
    Midwifery; 2015 Aug; 31(8):787-92. PubMed ID: 25936474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation.
    Charlson ME; Horwitz RI
    Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1984 Nov; 289(6454):1281-4. PubMed ID: 6437520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Randomised controlled trials in perinatal medicine: 2. Recruitment of a pregnant woman or her newborn child into more than one trial.
    Windsor PM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Mar; 105(3):370-1. PubMed ID: 9533007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Part III: Research on Intrapartum and Neonatal Care and Management.
    Barger M; Faucher MA; Murphy PA
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2015; 60(3):318-323. PubMed ID: 25923919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An Intrapartum Emergency: Neonatal Implications.
    Cohen A; Wieners S; Wolfe DS
    Neoreviews; 2023 Apr; 24(4):e255-e258. PubMed ID: 37002391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Cochrane Collaboration: evaluation of health care and services using systematic reviews of the results of randomized controlled trials.
    Dickersin K; Manheimer E
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 41(2):315-31. PubMed ID: 9646964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The development of a standard training toolkit for research studies that recruit pregnant women in labour.
    Kenyon S; Sears J; Reay H
    Trials; 2013 Oct; 14():362. PubMed ID: 24171801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reducing risk by improving standards of intrapartum care.
    Davis JA
    J R Soc Med; 2001 Jul; 94(7):372. PubMed ID: 11418722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Consumer-professional partnership to improve research: the experience of the Cochrane Collaboration's Pregnancy and Childbirth Group.
    Sakala C; Gyte G; Henderson S; Neilson JP; Horey D
    Birth; 2001 Jun; 28(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11380386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Early labour series.
    Spiby H; Cheyne H
    Midwifery; 2013 Jan; 29(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 23332115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. General practitioner's role in management of labour.
    Curzen P; Mountrose U
    Br Med J; 1977 Feb; 1(6059):509. PubMed ID: 837185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mark Baker replies to Daghni Rajasingam and Kate Harding.
    Baker M
    BMJ; 2014 Jul; 349():g4838. PubMed ID: 25077488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Establishment of Maternal and Perinatal Database for Quality, Equity and Dignity programme: Processes, challenges, lessons and prospects.
    Adanikin A; Tukur J; Lavin T; Ezekwe B; Aminu I; Aboyeji P; Adesina O; Chama C; Etuk S; Galadanci H; Ikechebelu J; Oladapo OT
    BJOG; 2024 Aug; 131 Suppl 3():5-19. PubMed ID: 38586885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. GMSC's advice on intrapartum care is unhelpful.
    Bradbrook J; Carmi M; Danby J; Fawdry R; Fletcher J; Gill D; Jackson-Baker A; Jewell D; McKenzie M; Noble A; Porter R; Seaman B; Smith L; Young G
    BMJ; 1996 Apr; 312(7035):910-1. PubMed ID: 8611900
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The tribulations of trials--intervention in communities.
    Susser M
    Am J Public Health; 1995 Feb; 85(2):156-8. PubMed ID: 7856769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of effect of CTG + STan with CTG alone on emergency Cesarean section rate: STan Australian Randomized controlled Trial (START).
    Kuah S; Simpson B; Salter A; Matthews G; Louise J; Bednarz J; Chandraharan E; Symonds I; McPhee A; Mol BW; Turnbull D; Wilkinson C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 62(4):462-470. PubMed ID: 37289946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reasons given by pregnant women for participating in a clinical trial aimed at preventing premature delivery: a qualitative analysis.
    Monteiro TM; Katz L; Bento SF; Amorim MM; Moriel PC; Pacagnella RC
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Mar; 19(1):97. PubMed ID: 30894167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The ethical issues regarding consent to clinical trials with pre-term or sick neonates: a systematic review (framework synthesis) of the empirical research.
    Wilman E; Megone C; Oliver S; Duley L; Gyte G; Wright JM
    Trials; 2015 Nov; 16():502. PubMed ID: 26537492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Striving for scientific stringency: a re-analysis of a randomised controlled trial considering first-time mothers' obstetric outcomes in relation to birth position.
    Thies-Lagergren L; Kvist LJ; Christensson K; Hildingsson I
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Nov; 12():135. PubMed ID: 23173988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.