BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15020131)

  • 1. Theoretical model to determine the effects of geometrical factors on the resorption of calcium phosphate bone substitutes.
    Bohner M; Baumgart F
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(17):3569-82. PubMed ID: 15020131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Synthesis and characterization of porous beta-tricalcium phosphate blocks.
    Bohner M; van Lenthe GH; Grünenfelder S; Hirsiger W; Evison R; Müller R
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(31):6099-105. PubMed ID: 15885772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Cellular culture of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on porous calcium-phosphate bone substitutes].
    Chouteau J; Bignon A; Chavassieux P; Chevalier J; Melin M; Fantozzi G; Boivin G; Hartmann D; Carret JP
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Feb; 89(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 12610435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Geometric analysis of porous bone substitutes using micro-computed tomography and fuzzy distance transform.
    Bashoor-Zadeh M; Baroud G; Bohner M
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Mar; 6(3):864-75. PubMed ID: 19671458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulation of the in vivo resorption rate of β-tricalcium phosphate bone graft substitutes implanted in a sheep model.
    Bashoor-Zadeh M; Baroud G; Bohner M
    Biomaterials; 2011 Sep; 32(27):6362-73. PubMed ID: 21658758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics with nested chitosan sponges for load-bearing bone implants.
    Zhang Y; Zhang M
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 Jul; 61(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 12001239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advanced bioceramic composite for bone tissue engineering: design principles and structure-bioactivity relationship.
    El-Ghannam AR
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2004 Jun; 69(3):490-501. PubMed ID: 15127396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preparation, degradation, and calcification of biodegradable polyurethane foams for bone graft substitutes.
    Gorna K; Gogolewski S
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2003 Dec; 67(3):813-27. PubMed ID: 14613229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes.
    Hing KA; Wilson LF; Buckland T
    Spine J; 2007; 7(4):475-90. PubMed ID: 17630146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fast setting calcium phosphate-chitosan scaffold: mechanical properties and biocompatibility.
    Xu HH; Simon CG
    Biomaterials; 2005 Apr; 26(12):1337-48. PubMed ID: 15482821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. 3D microenvironment as essential element for osteoinduction by biomaterials.
    Habibovic P; Yuan H; van der Valk CM; Meijer G; van Blitterswijk CA; de Groot K
    Biomaterials; 2005 Jun; 26(17):3565-75. PubMed ID: 15621247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The preparation of sintered bovine cancellous bone and a study of its mechanical and chemical behavior and biocompatibility].
    Zheng Q; Liu S
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Feb; 22(1):95-8. PubMed ID: 15762125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New macroporous calcium phosphate glass ceramic for guided bone regeneration.
    Navarro M; del Valle S; Martínez S; Zeppetelli S; Ambrosio L; Planell JA; Ginebra MP
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):4233-41. PubMed ID: 15046913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics.
    Mastrogiacomo M; Scaglione S; Martinetti R; Dolcini L; Beltrame F; Cancedda R; Quarto R
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jun; 27(17):3230-7. PubMed ID: 16488007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Of the in vivo behavior of calcium phosphate cements and glasses as bone substitutes.
    Sanzana ES; Navarro M; Macule F; Suso S; Planell JA; Ginebra MP
    Acta Biomater; 2008 Nov; 4(6):1924-33. PubMed ID: 18539102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Volumetric analysis of osteoclastic bioresorption of calcium phosphate ceramics with different solubilities.
    Winkler T; Hoenig E; Gildenhaar R; Berger G; Fritsch D; Janssen R; Morlock MM; Schilling AF
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Oct; 6(10):4127-35. PubMed ID: 20451677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Enhancement of bone regeneration and graft material resorption using surface-modified bioactive glass in cortical and human maxillary cystic bone defects.
    El-Ghannam A; Amin H; Nasr T; Shama A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):184-91. PubMed ID: 15101588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Porous hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate cylinders with two different pore size ranges implanted in the cancellous bone of rabbits. A comparative histomorphometric and histologic study of bony ingrowth and implant substitution.
    Eggli PS; Müller W; Schenk RK
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Jul; (232):127-38. PubMed ID: 2838207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mechanism of bone incorporation of beta-TCP bone substitute in open wedge tibial osteotomy in patients.
    Gaasbeek RD; Toonen HG; van Heerwaarden RJ; Buma P
    Biomaterials; 2005 Nov; 26(33):6713-9. PubMed ID: 15950278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Resorbability of bone substitute biomaterials by human osteoclasts.
    Schilling AF; Linhart W; Filke S; Gebauer M; Schinke T; Rueger JM; Amling M
    Biomaterials; 2004 Aug; 25(18):3963-72. PubMed ID: 15046886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.