112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15020173)
1. Cost-effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase screening in HMO women overdue for Pap test and mammography services.
Lynch FL; Whitlock EP; Valanis BG; Smith SK
Prev Med; 2004 Apr; 38(4):403-11. PubMed ID: 15020173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of extending cervical cancer screening intervals among women with prior normal pap tests.
Kulasingam SL; Myers ER; Lawson HW; McConnell KJ; Kerlikowske K; Melnikow J; Washington AE; Sawaya GF
Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):321-8. PubMed ID: 16449119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization.
Somkin CP; Hiatt RA; Hurley LB; Gruskin E; Ackerson L; Larson P
Arch Intern Med; 1997 Aug 11-25; 157(15):1658-64. PubMed ID: 9250226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Screening HMO women overdue for both mammograms and pap tests.
Valanis BG; Glasgow RE; Mullooly J; Vogt TM; Whitlock EP; Boles SM; Smith KS; Kimes TM
Prev Med; 2002 Jan; 34(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 11749095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Zollinger TW; Maraj M; Skinner CS; Zoppi KA; Muegge CM
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jan; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 12549813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. De novo establishment and cost-effectiveness of Papanicolaou cytology screening services in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.
Suba EJ; Nguyen CH; Nguyen BD; Raab SS;
Cancer; 2001 Mar; 91(5):928-39. PubMed ID: 11251944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use.
Lairson DR; DiCarlo M; Myers RE; Wolf T; Cocroft J; Sifri R; Rosenthal M; Vernon SW; Wender R
Cancer; 2008 Feb; 112(4):779-88. PubMed ID: 18098272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.
Crane LA; Leakey TA; Ehrsam G; Rimer BK; Warnecke RB
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 11008910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effectiveness of a community outreach intervention to improve follow-up among underserved women at highest risk for cervical cancer.
Engelstad LP; Stewart S; Otero-Sabogal R; Leung MS; Davis PI; Pasick RJ
Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):741-8. PubMed ID: 16125761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening rarely screened women: time-to-service and 24-month outcomes of tailored interventions.
Valanis B; Whitlock EE; Mullooly J; Vogt T; Smith S; Chen C; Glasgow RE
Prev Med; 2003 Nov; 37(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 14572429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term effectiveness and cost of a systematic care program for bipolar disorder.
Simon GE; Ludman EJ; Bauer MS; Unützer J; Operskalski B
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2006 May; 63(5):500-8. PubMed ID: 16651507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incremental cost-effectiveness of a collaborative care intervention for panic disorder.
Katon W; Russo J; Sherbourne C; Stein MB; Craske M; Fan MY; Roy-Byrne P
Psychol Med; 2006 Mar; 36(3):353-63. PubMed ID: 16403243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; McQuillen D; Martin D; Maraj M
Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 10564629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The costs of an outreach intervention for low-income women with abnormal Pap smears.
Wagner TH; Engelstad LP; McPhee SJ; Pasick RJ
Prev Chronic Dis; 2007 Jan; 4(1):A11. PubMed ID: 17173719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The roles of citizenship status, acculturation, and health insurance in breast and cervical cancer screening among immigrant women.
Echeverria SE; Carrasquillo O
Med Care; 2006 Aug; 44(8):788-92. PubMed ID: 16862042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
