BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15020213)

  • 1. Memory retrieval given two independent cues: cue selection or parallel access?
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    Cogn Psychol; 2004 May; 48(3):243-94. PubMed ID: 15020213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Configural processing in memory retrieval: multiple cues and ensemble representations.
    Dosher BA; Rosedale GS
    Cogn Psychol; 1997 Aug; 33(3):209-65. PubMed ID: 9245470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In search of cross-talk facilitation in a dual-cued recall task.
    Rickard TC; Bajic D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):750-67. PubMed ID: 16060778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: II. Episodic memory.
    Logan GD; Delheimer JA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):668-85. PubMed ID: 11394673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
    Kray J
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can helping hurt? Effects of constraining and nonconstraining retrieval cue on list transfer by mentally retarded adolescents.
    Evans RA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1980 Nov; 85(3):299-305. PubMed ID: 7446600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm.
    Miyake A; Emerson MJ; Padilla F; Ahn JC
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004; 115(2-3):123-42. PubMed ID: 14962397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contextual gating of memory retrieval.
    Butler J; Rovee-Collier C
    Dev Psychobiol; 1989 Sep; 22(6):533-52. PubMed ID: 2792567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of noticing in prospective memory forgetting.
    Kliegel M; Guynn MJ; Zimmer H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jun; 64(3):226-32. PubMed ID: 17113673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.
    McDaniel MA; Guynn MJ; Einstein GO; Breneiser J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 May; 30(3):605-14. PubMed ID: 15099129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation of the electrophysiological correlates of retrieval cue processing by the specificity of task demands.
    Johnson JD; Rugg MD
    Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1071(1):153-64. PubMed ID: 16413511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two spatial memories are not better than one: evidence of exclusivity in memory for object location.
    Baguley T; Lansdale MW; Lines LK; Parkin JK
    Cogn Psychol; 2006 May; 52(3):243-89. PubMed ID: 16359654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological correlates of retrieval processing: effects of consistent versus inconsistent retrieval demands.
    Johnson JD; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Sep; 18(9):1531-44. PubMed ID: 16989553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flexible cue use in food-caching birds.
    LaDage LD; Roth TC; Fox RA; Pravosudov VV
    Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):419-26. PubMed ID: 19050946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: the benefits of elaborative retrieval.
    Carpenter SK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1563-9. PubMed ID: 19857026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are independent probes truly independent?
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):934-42. PubMed ID: 19586262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Categorization and memory retrieval by three-month-olds.
    Hayne H; Rovee-Collier C; Perris EE
    Child Dev; 1987 Jun; 58(3):750-67. PubMed ID: 3608647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The control of memory retrieval: insights from event-related potentials.
    Werkle-Bergner M; Mecklinger A; Kray J; Meyer P; Düzel E
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):599-614. PubMed ID: 16099369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.