These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15020441)

  • 21. INBREEDING AND VARIANCE EFFECTIVE SIZES FOR NONRANDOM MATING POPULATIONS.
    Wang J
    Evolution; 1996 Oct; 50(5):1786-1794. PubMed ID: 28565611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Non-random mating for selection with restricted rates of inbreeding and overlapping generations.
    Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2002; 34(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 11929623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on "arbitrary" male characters.
    Heisler IL
    Heredity (Edinb); 1985 Oct; 55 ( Pt 2)():187-98. PubMed ID: 4055415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Expected increases in genetic merit from using optimized contributions in two livestock populations of beef cattle and sheep.
    Avendaño S; Villanueva B; Woolliams JA
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Dec; 81(12):2964-75. PubMed ID: 14677851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Kin selection is implicated in partial sib-mating populations with constant viability differences before mating.
    Lessard S
    Genetics; 2005 Sep; 171(1):407-13. PubMed ID: 15965260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of a population bottleneck on the evolution of genetic variance/covariance structure.
    Jarvis JP; Cropp SN; Vaughn TT; Pletscher LS; King-Ellison K; Adams-Hunt E; Erickson C; Cheverud JM
    J Evol Biol; 2011 Oct; 24(10):2139-52. PubMed ID: 21726329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationships Between Wright's F ST and F IS Statistics in a Context of Wahlund Effect.
    Zhivotovsky LA
    J Hered; 2015; 106(3):306-9. PubMed ID: 25888609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How are deleterious mutations purged? Drift versus nonrandom mating.
    Glémin S
    Evolution; 2003 Dec; 57(12):2678-87. PubMed ID: 14761049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mating strategies with genomic information reduce rates of inbreeding in animal breeding schemes without compromising genetic gain.
    Liu H; Henryon M; Sørensen AC
    Animal; 2017 Apr; 11(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 27531662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the Consequences of Purging and Linkage on Fitness and Genetic Diversity.
    Bersabé D; Caballero A; Pérez-Figueroa A; García-Dorado A
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Nov; 6(1):171-81. PubMed ID: 26564947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inbreeding depression and heterosis in a subdivided population: influence of the mating system.
    Theodorou K; Couvet D
    Genet Res; 2002 Oct; 80(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 12534214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Inbreeding, coancestry, and covariance between relatives for X-chromosomal loci.
    Grossman M; Eisen EJ
    J Hered; 1989; 80(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2926116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Inbreeding avoidance under different null models of random mating in the great tit.
    Szulkin M; Zelazowski P; Nicholson G; Sheldon BC
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jul; 78(4):778-88. PubMed ID: 19383076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A general procedure for predicting rates of inbreeding in populations undergoing mass selection.
    Bijma P; Van Arendonk JA; Woolliams JA
    Genetics; 2000 Apr; 154(4):1865-77. PubMed ID: 10747075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mendelian sampling terms as a selective advantage in optimum breeding schemes with restrictions on the rate of inbreeding.
    Avendaño S; Woolliams JA; Villanueva B
    Genet Res; 2004 Feb; 83(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 15125067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Mathematical modelling for variations of inbreeding populations fitness with single and polygenic traits.
    Sun S; Klebaner F; Tian T
    BMC Genomics; 2017 Mar; 18(Suppl 2):196. PubMed ID: 28361703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Genetic implications of mating structure in a Caribbean isolate.
    Leslie PW; Morrill WT; Dyke B
    Am J Hum Genet; 1981 Jan; 33(1):90-104. PubMed ID: 7468597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genetic drift outweighs natural selection at toll-like receptor (TLR) immunity loci in a re-introduced population of a threatened species.
    Grueber CE; Wallis GP; Jamieson IG
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Sep; 22(17):4470-82. PubMed ID: 23901904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Evaluation of inbreeding in laying hens by applying optimum genetic contribution and gene flow theory.
    König S; Tsehay F; Sitzenstock F; von Borstel UU; Schmutz M; Preisinger R; Simianer H
    Poult Sci; 2010 Apr; 89(4):658-67. PubMed ID: 20308397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.