202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15021077)
1. Comparison of the automated non-invasive oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BpTRU) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in a paediatric population.
Mattu GS; Heran BS; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 15021077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Overall accuracy of the BpTRU--an automated electronic blood pressure device.
Mattu GS; Heran BS; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 15021078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100(Beta) ) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Mattu GS; Perry TL; Wright JM
Blood Press Monit; 2001 Jun; 6(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 11518839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical evaluation of an automated oscillometric blood pressure wrist device.
Cuckson AC; Moran P; Seed P; Reinders A; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 15021076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.
Rogers P; Burke V; Stroud P; Puddey IB
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1999; 26(5-6):477-81. PubMed ID: 10386242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can an automatic oscillometric device replace a mercury sphygmomanometer on blood pressure measurement? a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Park SH; Park YS
Blood Press Monit; 2019 Dec; 24(6):265-276. PubMed ID: 31658107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical decision-making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU) measurement device.
Graves JW; Nash C; Burger K; Bailey K; Sheps SG
J Hum Hypertens; 2003 Dec; 17(12):823-7. PubMed ID: 14704726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey.
Myers MG; McInnis NH; Fodor GJ; Leenen FH
Am J Hypertens; 2008 Mar; 21(3):280-3. PubMed ID: 18219304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical evaluation of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor in adults and children based on the 1992 AAMI SP-10 standards.
Ling J; Ohara Y; Orime Y; Noon GP; Takatani S
J Clin Monit; 1995 Mar; 11(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 7760085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of TM-2655 oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement.
Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Babaeva LA; Moiseev VS
Blood Press Monit; 2006 Apr; 11(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 16534410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of an oscillometric device for monitoring blood pressure in dialysis patients.
Lodi CA; Estridge C; Ghidini C
Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2950-61. PubMed ID: 17556423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of a new algorithm for the BPM-100 electronic oscillometric office blood pressure monitor.
Wright JM; Mattu GS; Perry TL; Gelferc ME; Strange KD; Zorn A; Chen Y
Blood Press Monit; 2001 Jun; 6(3):161-5. PubMed ID: 11518840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wrist blood pressure-measuring devices: a comparative study of accuracy with a standard auscultatory method using a mercury manometer.
Altunkan S; Yildiz S; Azer S
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Oct; 7(5):281-4. PubMed ID: 12409888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs.
Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C
Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inflationary oscillometric blood pressure monitoring: validation of the OMRON-MIT.
Golara M; Jones C; Randhawa M; Shennan AH
Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):325-8. PubMed ID: 12488653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of two oscillometric blood pressure monitors in subjects with atrial fibrillation.
Lamb TS; Thakrar A; Ghosh M; Wilson MP; Wilson TW
Clin Invest Med; 2010 Feb; 33(1):E54-62. PubMed ID: 20144271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Home blood pressure measurement: validation of the Braun BP 2550 (UG) monitor according to the ESH International Protocol.
Nolly H; Romero M; Nolly A; Osso P; Reinoso O; Nolly M
Blood Press Monit; 2004 Feb; 9(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 15021079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Arterial stiffness as underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a sphygmomanometer.
van Popele NM; Bos WJ; de Beer NA; van Der Kuip DA; Hofman A; Grobbee DE; Witteman JC
Hypertension; 2000 Oct; 36(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 11040223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
