These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15021077)

  • 21. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace.
    Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparisons of auscultatory hybrid and automated sphygmomanometers with mercury sphygmomanometry in hypertensive and normotensive pregnant women: parallel validation studies.
    Davis GK; Roberts LM; Mangos GJ; Brown MA
    J Hypertens; 2015 Mar; 33(3):499-505; discussion 505-6. PubMed ID: 25380148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device.
    Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA
    J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
    Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of the Microlife BP 3BTO-A oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol.
    Cuckson AC; Reinders A; Shabeeh H; Shennan AH;
    Blood Press Monit; 2002 Dec; 7(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 12488652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of the OMRON M7 (HEM-780-E) blood pressure measuring device in a population requiring large cuff use according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    El Feghali RN; Topouchian JA; Pannier BM; El Assaad HA; Asmar RG;
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 17496467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Validation of the Artsana CSI 610 automated blood pressure monitor in adults according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Pini C; Pastori M; Baccheschi J; Omboni S; Parati G;
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Jun; 12(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 17496468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of an oscillometric blood pressure measuring device: a substudy of the HOT Study. Hypertension Optimal Treatment.
    Lithell H; Berglund L
    Blood Press; 1998 May; 7(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 9758084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Calibrating Local Population-Based Blood Pressure Data from NYC HANES 2013-2014.
    Kanchi R; Perlman S; Ostchega Y; Chamany S; Shimbo D; Chernov C; Thorpe LE
    J Urban Health; 2019 Oct; 96(5):720-725. PubMed ID: 31486004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric automated blood pressure monitors in the setting of preeclampsia.
    Natarajan P; Shennan AH; Penny J; Halligan AW; de Swiet M; Anthony J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1203-10. PubMed ID: 10561646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of blood pressure measurements between an automated oscillometric device and a Hawksley random-zero sphygmomanometer in the northern Sweden MONICA study.
    Eriksson M; Carlberg B; Jansson JH
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Aug; 17(4):164-70. PubMed ID: 22781634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
    Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of the Mindray VS9 Vital Signs Monitor in a combined adult and pediatric population according to ISO Standard 81060-2:2018.
    Guo N; Zhang Y; Chen W; Zhong H; Li L; Xie H; Zhu W; Liu J; Li S
    Blood Press Monit; 2024 Aug; 29(4):207-211. PubMed ID: 38523458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Validation of semi-automatic device UA-704 for self-measurement of blood pressure.
    Kobalava ZD; Kotovskaya YV; Rodionov E
    Blood Press Monit; 2005 Aug; 10(4):223-5. PubMed ID: 16077269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension.
    Omboni S; Riva I; Giglio A; Caldara G; Groppelli A; Parati G
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 17625396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Validation of A&D UA-778 blood pressure monitor in children.
    Narogan MV; Narogan MI; Syutkina EV
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Oct; 14(5):228-31. PubMed ID: 19938323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Validation of the A&D UA-1020 upper-arm blood pressure monitor with six different-shaped or different-sized cuffs according to the British Hypertension Society protocol.
    Zeng WF; Kang YY; Liu M; Li Y; Wang JG
    Blood Press Monit; 2013 Oct; 18(5):272-7. PubMed ID: 24013618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.