191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15022679)
1. Forcible medication: a new insanity defence.
Economist; 2003 Mar; 366(8313):31. PubMed ID: 15022679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Seeking an answer: questioning the validity of forcible medication to ensure mental competency of those condemned to die.
Stricker BW
McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 32(1):317-40. PubMed ID: 15709265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Medicate-to-execute: current trends in death penalty jurisprudence and the perils of dual loyalty.
Shaivitz DS
J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(1):149-74. PubMed ID: 15468506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Restored to health to be put to death: reconciling the legal and ethical dilemmas of medicating to execute in Singleton v. Norris.
Hensl KB
Villanova Law Rev; 2004; 49(2):291-328. PubMed ID: 16485377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
Cantor JD
Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Old law meets new medicine: revisiting involuntary psychotropic medication of the criminal defendant.
Siegel DM; Grudzinskas AJ; Pinals DA
Wis L Rev; 2001; 2():307-80. PubMed ID: 16281337
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
Winick BJ
N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
Dlugacz HA
Law Psychol Rev; 1993; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. State can make inmate sane enough to execute.
Liptak A
N Y Times Web; 2003 Feb; ():A1, A27. PubMed ID: 12812158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. New hearing on forced medication of inmate.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov; ():A30. PubMed ID: 11646793
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Between madness and death: the medicate-to-execute controversy.
Latzer B
Crim Justice Ethics; 2003; 22(2):3-14. PubMed ID: 15080128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Competency to be executed and forced medication: Singleton v. Norris.
Zonana HV
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(3):372-6. PubMed ID: 14584539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Justices let stand ruling that allows forcibly drugging an inmate before execution.
Lewis NA
N Y Times Web; 2003 Oct; ():A16. PubMed ID: 14610765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Forced medication of defendants to achieve trial competency: an update on the law after Sell.
Hilgers K; Ramer P
Georget J Leg Ethics; 2004; 17(4):813-26. PubMed ID: 15685765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Forcible medication and personal autonomy: the case of Charles Thomas Sell.
Quinlan M
Boston Univ Law Rev; 2004 Feb; 84(1):275-99. PubMed ID: 16211756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Trial rights and psychotropic drugs: the case against administering involuntary medications to a defendant during trial.
Klein DW
Vanderbilt Law Rev; 2002; 55(1):165-218. PubMed ID: 12680366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
LeBlanc SM
Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring ethical, legal, and professional issues with the mentally ill on death row.
Plichta JE
J Forensic Nurs; 2008; 4(3):143-6. PubMed ID: 18798882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Major tranquilizers in prison: drug therapy and the unconsenting inmate.
Sitnick SA
Willamette Law J; 1975; 11(3):378-97. PubMed ID: 11664569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. "Synthetic sanity": the ethics and legality of using psychotropic medications to render death row inmates competent for execution.
Daugherty KM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 17(2):715-35. PubMed ID: 11475573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
