These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1502324)

  • 1. Comparative investigation of dynamic loading of prepared and intact human premolars.
    Catović AM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Jun; 23(6):435-8. PubMed ID: 1502324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The response of human premolars to cyclic loading.
    Catović A; Kraljević K; Jerolimov V; Celebić A; Kovacićek F; Valentić-Peruzović M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Apr; 24(4):320-4. PubMed ID: 9147307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations.
    de V Habekost L; Camacho GB; Azevedo EC; Demarco FF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):186-92. PubMed ID: 17854619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Mechanical resistance of endodontically treated upper first premolar crowns].
    Marcoli PA; Pasini S; Visconti L; Bellagamba F
    G Ital Endod; 1991; 5(1):23-5. PubMed ID: 1782437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fracture load of composite resin and feldspathic all-ceramic CAD/CAM crowns.
    Attia A; Abdelaziz KM; Freitag S; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Feb; 95(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16473085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH; Francischone CE; Ishikiriama A; Franco EB
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cuspal deflection of maxillary premolars restored with bonded amalgam.
    el-Badrawy WA
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):337-43. PubMed ID: 10823082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques.
    Santos MJ; Bezerra RB
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):585. PubMed ID: 16202199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures.
    Reeh ES; Messer HH; Douglas WH
    J Endod; 1989 Nov; 15(11):512-6. PubMed ID: 2639947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ; Cawte SG; Wilson NH
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth.
    Larson TD; Douglas WH; Geistfeld RE
    Oper Dent; 1981; 6(1):2-5. PubMed ID: 6941225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns.
    Forberger N; Göhring TN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 18922255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory-processed composite resin restorations.
    Fonseca RB; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Correr-Sobrinho L; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Oct; 98(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 17936127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of cavity design and glass fiber posts on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premolars.
    Soares CJ; Soares PV; de Freitas Santos-Filho PC; Castro CG; Magalhaes D; Versluis A
    J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):1015-9. PubMed ID: 18634938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. All-ceramic partial coverage premolar restorations. Cavity preparation design, reliability and fracture resistance after fatigue.
    Stappert CF; Guess PC; Gerds T; Strub JR
    Am J Dent; 2005 Aug; 18(4):275-80. PubMed ID: 16296437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture strength of weakened human premolars restored with amalgam with and without cusp coverage.
    Mondelli RF; Barbosa WF; Mondelli J; Franco EB; Carvalho RM
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 10388373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.