246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15023386)
1. Comparison of dynamic and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiation therapy planning and delivery.
Alaei P; Higgins PD; Weaver R; Nguyen N
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 15023386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Major reduction of monitor units with the avoidance of leaf-sequencing step by direct aperture based IMRT optimisation.
Seppälä J; Lahtinen T; Kolmonen P
Acta Oncol; 2009; 48(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 18766997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical evaluation of direct aperture optimization when applied to head-and-neck IMRT.
Jones S; Williams M
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 18262129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques.
Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Temporal characterization and in vitro comparison of cell survival following the delivery of 3D-conformal, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
McGarry CK; Butterworth KT; Trainor C; O'Sullivan JM; Prise KM; Hounsell AR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Apr; 56(8):2445-57. PubMed ID: 21427488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A dose verification method using a monitor unit matrix for dynamic IMRT on Varian linear accelerators.
Chen X; Yue NJ; Chen W; Saw CB; Heron DE; Stefanik D; Antemann R; Huq MS
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5641-52. PubMed ID: 16306658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver IMRT plans in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Kim Y; Verhey LJ; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Apr; 52(8):2147-56. PubMed ID: 17404460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A feasibility study of using conventional jaws to deliver complex IMRT plans for head and neck cancer.
Mu G; Xia P
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Sep; 54(18):5613-23. PubMed ID: 19724096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Study on surface dose generated in prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment.
Chow JC; Grigorov GN; Barnett RB
Med Dosim; 2006; 31(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 17134664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simplified intensity-modulated arc therapy for dose escalated prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Bauman G; Gete E; Chen JZ; Wong E
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 15023389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions.
Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Elements of commissioning step-and-shoot IMRT: delivery equipment and planning system issues posed by small segment dimensions and small monitor units.
Aspradakis MM; Lambert GD; Steele A
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(4):233-42. PubMed ID: 16275566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. IMRT delivery to a moving target by dynamic MLC tracking: delivery for targets moving in two dimensions in the beam's eye view.
McQuaid D; Webb S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 51(19):4819-39. PubMed ID: 16985273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved stratification algorithms for step-and-shoot MLC delivery in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Süss P; Küfer KH; Thieke C
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):6039-51. PubMed ID: 17881818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lens dose in MLC-based IMRT treatments of the head and neck.
Pawlicki T; Luxton G; Le QT; Findley D; Ma CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 May; 59(1):293-9. PubMed ID: 15093926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intensity modulated radiation therapy with multileaf collimators of different leaf widths: a comparison of achievable dose distributions.
Nill S; Tücking T; Münter MW; Oelfke U
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Apr; 75(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 15878108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SIFT: a method to verify the IMRT fluence delivered during patient treatment using an electronic portal imaging device.
Vieira SC; Dirkx ML; Heijmen BJ; de Boer HC
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(3):981-93. PubMed ID: 15465217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Four-dimensional IMRT treatment planning using a DMLC motion-tracking algorithm.
Suh Y; Sawant A; Venkat R; Keall PJ
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3821-35. PubMed ID: 19478383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
