These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15023793)

  • 21. Anthropometric Analysis of the Nigerian Face: Any Conformity to the Neoclassical Canons?
    Olusanya AA; Aladelusi TO; Adedokun B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 29(7):1978-1982. PubMed ID: 30106812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Historical Tools of Anthropometric Facial Assessment: A Systematic Raw Data Analysis on the Applicability of the Neoclassical Canons and Golden Ratio.
    Khoshab N; Donnelly MR; Sayadi LR; Vyas RM; Banyard DA
    Aesthet Surg J; 2022 Jan; 42(1):NP1-NP10. PubMed ID: 34515761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of Neoclassical Canons in Adult Kenyans of Indian Descent.
    Sarna K; Osundwa TM; Kamau M; Sonigra KJ
    Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr; 2023 Mar; 16(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 36824184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Neoclassical canons of facial beauty: Do we see the deviations?
    Pavlic A; Trinajstic Zrinski M; Katic V; Spalj S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 45(5):741-747. PubMed ID: 28283341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anthropometric Analysis of the Face.
    Zacharopoulos GV; Manios A; Kau CH; Velagrakis G; Tzanakakis GN; de Bree E
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e71-5. PubMed ID: 26703056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A 3D analysis of Caucasian and African American facial morphologies in a US population.
    Talbert L; Kau CH; Christou T; Vlachos C; Souccar N
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 24671286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of craniofacial measurements of young adult African-American and North American white males and females.
    Farkas LG; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Dec; 59(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 18046155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relation between anthropometric and cephalometric measurements and proportions of the face of healthy young white adult men and women.
    Budai M; Farkas LG; Tompson B; Katic M; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Mar; 14(2):154-61; discussion 162-3. PubMed ID: 12621284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Ethnic variation in lower face anthropometry on facial computed tomography scans for patients seeking facial feminization surgery.
    Nguyen NH; Taylor JM; Huang KX; Shariati K; Chevalier JM; Miller MN; Cronin BJ; Lee JC
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2024 Jun; 93():222-231. PubMed ID: 38705125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mesh diagram cephalometric norms for Americans of African descent.
    Bailey KL; Taylor RW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):218-23. PubMed ID: 9714287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Craniofacial morphologic parameters in a Persian population: an anthropometric study.
    Amini F; Mashayekhi Z; Rahimi H; Morad G
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1874-81. PubMed ID: 25203584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Korean American woman's nose: an in-depth nasal photogrammatic analysis.
    Choe KS; Yalamanchili HR; Litner JA; Sclafani AP; Quatela VC
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2006; 8(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 16982988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A systematic review of interethnic variability in facial dimensions.
    Fang F; Clapham PJ; Chung KC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Feb; 127(2):874-881. PubMed ID: 21285791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Vertical and horizontal neoclassical facial canons in Turkish young adults.
    Bozkir MG; Karakas P; Oguz O
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Jun; 26(3):212-9. PubMed ID: 14625792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cephalometric standards for American Negro children.
    Alexander TL; Hitchcock HP
    Am J Orthod; 1978 Sep; 74(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 281133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective.
    Vegter F; Hage JJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Oct; 106(5):1090-6. PubMed ID: 11039382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of soft-tissue morphology of the face in 1,050 young adults.
    Borman H; Ozgür F; Gürsu G
    Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Mar; 42(3):280-8. PubMed ID: 10096619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Anthropometric and aesthetic analysis of the Indian American woman's face.
    Husein OF; Sepehr A; Garg R; Sina-Khadiv M; Gattu S; Waltzman J; Wu EC; Shieh M; Heitmann GM; Galle SE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Nov; 63(11):1825-31. PubMed ID: 19962360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Proportion indices in the craniofacial regions of 284 healthy North American white children between 1 and 5 years of age.
    Farkas LG; Hreczko TM; Katic MJ; Forrest CR
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 12544216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-dimensional facial analyses of Indian and Malaysian women.
    Kusugal P; Ruttonji Z; Gowda R; Rajpurohit L; Lad P; Ritu
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(3):332-6. PubMed ID: 26321831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.