These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15024369)

  • 1. Determination of the resolution of a digital system for panoramic radiography based on CCD technology.
    Mastoris M; Li G; Welander U; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Mar; 97(3):408-14. PubMed ID: 15024369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between spatial resolution and ball distortion rate of panoramic radiography.
    Yeom HG; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):68. PubMed ID: 32560631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Charge-coupled device panoramic radiography: effect of beam energy on radiation exposure.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Kelly MS; Firriolo FJ; Yancey JM; Stewart AV
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 9482021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bitewing examination with four digital receptors.
    Bahrami G; Hagstrøm C; Wenzel A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Sep; 32(5):317-21. PubMed ID: 14709607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observer performance based on marginal bone tissue visibility in Scanora panoramic radiography and posterior bitewing radiography.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2008; 10(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18493164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitometric properties of Agfa Dentus OrthoLux, Agfa Dentus ST8G, and Kodak Ektavision panoramic radiographic film.
    Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kobayashi N; Farman AG; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Feb; 91(2):244-51. PubMed ID: 11174605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporomandibular joint pantomography using charge-coupled device, photostimulable phosphor, and film receptors: a comparison.
    Farman TT; Farman AG
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):9-13. PubMed ID: 10342155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography.
    Gavala S; Donta C; Tsiklakis K; Boziari A; Kamenopoulou V; Stamatakis HC
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18448296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the diagnostic utility of two image receptors for panoramic radiography.
    Carmichael FA; Hirschmann PN; Scaife B; Sheard L; Mackenzie A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 10654038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of image quality and radiation exposure for dental radiographs produced using a charge-coupled device and a phosphor plate system.
    Farrier SL; Drage NA; Newcombe RG; Hayes SJ; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2009 Oct; 42(10):900-7. PubMed ID: 19548931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth.
    Akarslan ZZ; Akdevelioğlu M; Güngör K; Erten H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):458-63. PubMed ID: 19033431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):166-8. PubMed ID: 9735460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between Scanora panoramic radiography and bitewing radiography in the assessment of marginal bone tissue.
    Ivanauskaite D; Lindh C; Rangne K; Rohlin M
    Stomatologija; 2006; 8(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16687909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition.
    Uprichard KK; Potter BJ; Russell CM; Schafer TE; Adair S; Weller RN
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The subjective image quality of conventional and digital panoramic radiography among 6 to 10 year old children.
    Makris N; Tsiklakis K; Alexiou KE; Vierrou AM; Stefaniotis T
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2006; 31(2):109-12. PubMed ID: 17315805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs.
    Garcia-Figueroa MA; Raboud DW; Lam EW; Heo G; Major PW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18617108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A preliminary study for determination of three-dimensional root apex position of the maxillary teeth using camera calibration technology.
    Oh HJ; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(1):20150186. PubMed ID: 26317151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Quantitative analysis of the complete image layer in rotational panoramic radiography].
    Naitoh M
    Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi; 1990 Dec; 28(4):1199-224. PubMed ID: 2135152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of bone loss with different X-ray techniques in periodontal patients.
    Kim TS; Obst C; Zehaczek S; Geenen C
    J Periodontol; 2008 Jul; 79(7):1141-9. PubMed ID: 18597595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.