These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1502508)
1. DNA fingerprinting reconsidered (again). Beardsley T Sci Am; 1992 Jul; 267(1):26. PubMed ID: 1502508 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. panel seeking restriction on use of DNA in courts. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, C7. PubMed ID: 11646944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. DNA fingerprinting: academy reports. Roberts L Science; 1992 Apr; 256(5055):300-1. PubMed ID: 1566077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Statement by DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Haemogenetics concerning the National Academy of Sciences report on DNA Technology in Forensic Science in the USA. Forensic Sci Int; 1993 Apr; 59(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 8505025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Courts reject DNA fingerprinting, citing controversy after NAS report. Anderson C Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6394):349. PubMed ID: 1406941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Chief says panel backs courts' use of a genetic test. Kolata G N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, A23. PubMed ID: 11647446 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA forensic science 1995. Morton NE Eur J Hum Genet; 1995; 3(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 7552142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Challenges to the admissibility of DNA profiling evidence in criminal trials. Roberts H Aust Fam Physician; 1993 Apr; 22(4):507-11. PubMed ID: 8481114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of forensic DNA evidence in prosecutors'offices. Prottas JM; Noble AA J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 17518857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Manufacturing convictions: why defendants are entitled to the data underlying forensic DNA kits. Mellon JN Duke Law J; 2001 Dec; 51(3):1097-137. PubMed ID: 11944660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Forensic population genetics and the National Research Council (NRC). Weir BS Am J Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 52(2):437-40. PubMed ID: 8430704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Crime and punishment. Opar A Nat Med; 2006 Oct; 12(10):1110-1. PubMed ID: 17024196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Juries and crime labs: correcting the weak links in the DNA chain. McDonald R Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):345-63. PubMed ID: 9702277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of DNA statistics in criminal trials. Henderson JP Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Aug; 128(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12175963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Academy's about-face on forensic DNA. Marshall E Science; 1996 May; 272(5263):803-4. PubMed ID: 8629004 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Genetic witness: forensic uses of DNA tests. Nishimi RY; O'Connor KW; Gwin HL; Anderson MA J Int Bioethique; 1991; 2(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 11651050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. DNA fingerprinting on trial: the dramatic early history of a new forensic technique. Aronson JD Endeavour; 2005 Sep; 29(3):126-31. PubMed ID: 16087235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forensic DNA data banks: considerations for the health sector. Lakra R; Dimitriadis F Health Law Can; 2002 Feb; 22(3):57-70. PubMed ID: 11915589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. DNA fingerprinting in the criminal justice system: an overview. Varsha DNA Cell Biol; 2006 Mar; 25(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 16569197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]