These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1502544)

  • 1. Science is great, but scientists are still people.
    Kornberg A
    Science; 1992 Aug; 257(5072):859. PubMed ID: 1502544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Worse than pulp fiction: fraud in science.
    Ganten D
    J Mol Med (Berl); 1997 Oct; 75(10):689-91. PubMed ID: 9382991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Devi case and more.
    Bailar JC
    Science; 1995 Aug; 269(5227):1035. PubMed ID: 7652546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific conduct: contrasts on a gray scale.
    Bloom FE
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5218):1679. PubMed ID: 7792581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The matter of standards. I. The individual scientist.
    Wilkins AS
    Bioessays; 2008 Sep; 30(9):795-7. PubMed ID: 18693276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. McGill: analyzing the data.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1995 Jun; 268(5218):1714. PubMed ID: 7605516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Problems of integrity are 'pervasive'.
    Macilwain C
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):719. PubMed ID: 8657263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misconduct: don't penalize the honest majority of scientists.
    Moore JP
    Nature; 2010 Aug; 466(7310):1040. PubMed ID: 20739985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ethics of scientific research: an analysis of focus groups of scientists and institutional representatives.
    Wenger NS; Korenman SG; Berk R; Berry S
    J Investig Med; 1997 Aug; 45(6):371-80. PubMed ID: 9291693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Integrity in science: a constant concern].
    Drenth PJ
    Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg; 2004; 66(5-6):321-33. PubMed ID: 15641563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fraud and hoaxes in science.
    James WH
    Nature; 1995 Oct; 377(6549):474. PubMed ID: 7566137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The codex of science: honesty, precision, and truth--and its violations.
    Lüscher TF
    Eur Heart J; 2013 Apr; 34(14):1018-23. PubMed ID: 23487520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncivil and malicious behavior in science.
    Guidotti TL
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2017 Jan; 72(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 27901416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Scientific misconduct. Science meets forensic science.
    Anderson C
    Nature; 1990 Oct; 347(6293):507. PubMed ID: 2215671
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stopping the rot in nutrition science.
    Margetts B
    Public Health Nutr; 2006 Apr; 9(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 16571169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Champions of science or blacklisting bureaucrats?
    Tokarski C
    J Am Health Policy; 1991; 1(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 10116471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A question of style: method, integrity and the meaning of proper science.
    Penders B; Vos R; Horstman K
    Endeavour; 2009 Sep; 33(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 19665231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Research ethics 101: the responsible conduct of research.
    Ingham JC
    Semin Speech Lang; 2003 Nov; 24(4):323-37. PubMed ID: 14722805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shaking up science.
    Couzin-Frankel J
    Science; 2013 Jan; 339(6118):386-9. PubMed ID: 23349264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research misconduct and the scientific process: continuing quality improvement.
    Koppelman-White E
    Account Res; 2006; 13(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 17124759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.