457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15025658)
1. Clinical performance of a resin-modified glass-ionomer and two polyacid-modified resin composites in cervical lesions restorations: 1-year follow-up.
Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Palma-Dibb RG
J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 15025658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Two-year clinical evaluation of four polyacid-modified resin composites and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement in Class V lesions.
Ermiş RB
Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(7):542-8. PubMed ID: 12165991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-year clinical evaluation of two resin composites, two polymerization methods, and a resin-modified glass ionomer in non-carious cervical lesions.
Koubi S; Raskin A; Bukiet F; Pignoly C; Toca E; Tassery H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):42-53. PubMed ID: 17091139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions.
Loguercio AD; Reis A; Barbosa AN; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 15008339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 1-year clinical evaluation of Compoglass and Fuji II LC in cervical erosion/abfraction lesions.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Gregory PN; Owens BM
Am J Dent; 1999 Jun; 12(3):119-22. PubMed ID: 10649933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of hybrid ionomer restoratives in Class V abrasion lesions: two-year results.
Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA
Quintessence Int; 1997 Apr; 28(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 10332375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-year clinical performance of a polyacid-modified resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material.
Brackett WW; Browning WD; Ross JA; Brackett MG
Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 11203770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A clinical evaluation of a resin composite and a compomer in non-carious Class V lesions. A 3-year follow-up.
Pollington S; van Noort R
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18435377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention of a resin-modified glass ionomer adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions. A 6-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2005 Aug; 33(7):541-7. PubMed ID: 16005793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomers and compomers in Class V carious lesions.
Abdalla AI; Alhadainy HA; García-Godoy F
Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 9545915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 5-year clinical performance of resin composite versus resin modified glass ionomer restorative system in non-carious cervical lesions.
Franco EB; Benetti AR; Ishikiriama SK; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Jorge MF; Navarro MF
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 16924979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Two-year clinical effectiveness of a resin-modified glass-ionomer adhesive.
Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):363-8. PubMed ID: 15002948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct resin composite restorations versus indirect composite inlays: one-year results.
Mendonça JS; Neto RG; Santiago SL; Lauris JR; Navarro MF; de Carvalho RM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 May; 11(3):025-32. PubMed ID: 20461321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical evaluation of direct esthetic restorations in cervical abrasion/erosion lesions: one-year results.
Powell LV; Gordon GE; Johnson GH
Quintessence Int; 1991 Sep; 22(9):687-92. PubMed ID: 1835107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results.
Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One-year clinical performance of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a resin composite restorative material in unprepared Class V restorations.
Brackett MG; Dib A; Brackett WW; Estrada BE; Reyes AA
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 11931132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
