These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15025664)

  • 1. Are caregivers' reports of motivation valid? Reliability and validity of the Reiss Profile MR/DD.
    Lecavalier L; Havercamp SM
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2004 Mar; 48(Pt 3):217-24. PubMed ID: 15025664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal stability and accuracy of motivational profiles.
    Lecavalier L; Tassé MJ
    Am J Ment Retard; 2003 May; 108(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 12691598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comprehensive assessment of human strivings: test-retest reliability and validity of the Reiss Profile.
    Havercamp SM; Reiss S
    J Pers Assess; 2003 Oct; 81(2):123-32. PubMed ID: 12946919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The development and validation of a carer questionnaire to assess cognitive function in neuropsychiatric patients.
    Randhawa S; Walterfang M; Miller K; Scholes A; Mocellin R; Velakoulis D
    J Psychosom Res; 2007 Jul; 63(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 17586342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability analysis of the motivation assessment scale.
    Spreat S; Connelly L
    Am J Ment Retard; 1996 Mar; 100(5):528-32. PubMed ID: 8852303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The reliability and validity of general psychotic rating scales with people with mild and moderate intellectual disabilities: an empirical investigation.
    Hatton C; Haddock G; Taylor JL; Coldwell J; Crossley R; Peckham N
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2005 Jul; 49(Pt 7):490-500. PubMed ID: 15966956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment.
    Wrisley DM; Marchetti GF; Kuharsky DK; Whitney SL
    Phys Ther; 2004 Oct; 84(10):906-18. PubMed ID: 15449976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of the Non-Communicating Adult Pain Checklist (NCAPC), assessed by different groups of health workers.
    Lotan M; Moe-Nilssen R; Ljunggren AE; Strand LI
    Res Dev Disabil; 2009; 30(4):735-45. PubMed ID: 19036559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interrater reliability and convergent validity of the American Academy for Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine methodology for conducting systematic reviews.
    Wiart L; Kolaski K; Butler C; Vogtle L; Logan LR; Hickman R; Romeiser J; Samson-Fang L; Matsuba CA; Baird MW; Roxborough L; Mayson T; Dinu I
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2012 Jul; 54(7):606-11. PubMed ID: 22577944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of the new Backache Index (BAI) in patients with low back pain.
    Farasyn A; Meeusen R
    Spine J; 2006; 6(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16934729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability and validity of the dynamic gait index in persons with chronic stroke.
    Jonsdottir J; Cattaneo D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 88(11):1410-5. PubMed ID: 17964880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reliability and validity of the Vertigo Symptom Scale and the Vertigo Dizziness Imbalance Questionnaires in a Turkish patient population with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
    Yanik B; Külcü DG; Kurtais Y; Boynukalin S; Kurtarah H; Gökmen D
    J Vestib Res; 2008; 18(2-3):159-70. PubMed ID: 19126986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spanish version of the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98: reliability and validity.
    Fonseca F; Bulbena A; Navarrete R; Aragay N; Capo M; Lobo A; Trzepacz PT
    J Psychosom Res; 2005 Sep; 59(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 16198187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of the Turkish version of the Quebec back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain.
    Melikoglu MA; Kocabas H; Sezer I; Bilgilisoy M; Tuncer T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Mar; 34(6):E219-24. PubMed ID: 19282728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity theory of motivation and psychopathology: an exploratory study.
    Lecavalier L; Tassé MJ
    Am J Ment Retard; 2002 Mar; 107(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 11853528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The cognitive risk profile for pain: development of a self-report inventory for identifying beliefs and attitudes that interfere with pain management.
    Cook AJ; Degood DE
    Clin J Pain; 2006 May; 22(4):332-45. PubMed ID: 16691085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The scale for contraversive pushing: A reliability and validity study.
    Baccini M; Paci M; Rinaldi LA
    Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2006 Dec; 20(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 17082502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Validity and reliability of the Turkish Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire.
    Ertaş M; Siva A; Dalkara T; Uzuner N; Dora B; Inan L; Idiman F; Sarica Y; Selçuki D; Sirin H; Oğuzhanoğlu A; Irkeç C; Ozmenoğlu M; Ozbenli T; Oztürk M; Saip S; Neyal M; Zarifoğlu M;
    Headache; 2004 Sep; 44(8):786-93. PubMed ID: 15330825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.