These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

676 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15026264)

  • 1. Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.
    Horvath AR; Pewsner D
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Apr; 342(1-2):23-39. PubMed ID: 15026264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in laboratory medicine: principles and methods].
    Watine J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2004; 62(6):611-27. PubMed ID: 15563420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interventions for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Are Practice Guidelines Based on Systematic Reviews?
    Lindsley K; Li T; Ssemanda E; Virgili G; Dickersin K
    Ophthalmology; 2016 Apr; 123(4):884-97. PubMed ID: 26804762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence-based guidelines in laboratory medicine: principles and methods.
    Oosterhuis WP; Bruns DE; Watine J; Sandberg S; Horvath AR
    Clin Chem; 2004 May; 50(5):806-18. PubMed ID: 15105349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The science of systematic reviewing studies of diagnostic tests.
    Oosterhuis WP; Niessen RW; Bossuyt PM
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2000 Jul; 38(7):577-88. PubMed ID: 11028761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evidence-based laboratory medicine].
    Horváth AR
    Orv Hetil; 2003 May; 144(18):869-76. PubMed ID: 12785240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.
    Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Becker LA; Featherstone R; Hartling L
    Syst Rev; 2016 Nov; 5(1):190. PubMed ID: 27842604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to prepare a systematic review of economic evaluations for informing evidence-based healthcare decisions: a five-step approach (part 1/3).
    van Mastrigt GA; Hiligsmann M; Arts JJ; Broos PH; Kleijnen J; Evers SM; Majoie MH
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2016 Dec; 16(6):689-704. PubMed ID: 27805469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology): The Joanna Briggs Institute's approach.
    Moola S; Munn Z; Sears K; Sfetcu R; Currie M; Lisy K; Tufanaru C; Qureshi R; Mattis P; Mu P
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 26262566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A critical appraisal of the methodology and quality of evidence of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traditional Chinese medical nursing interventions: a systematic review of reviews.
    Jin YH; Wang GH; Sun YR; Li Q; Zhao C; Li G; Si JH; Li Y; Lu C; Shang HC
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e011514. PubMed ID: 28186925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions.
    Thomas BH; Ciliska D; Dobbins M; Micucci S
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2004; 1(3):176-84. PubMed ID: 17163895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Overview of evidence-based medicine: challenges for evidence-based laboratory medicine.
    McQueen MJ
    Clin Chem; 2001 Aug; 47(8):1536-46. PubMed ID: 11468264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.