These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
508 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15027429)
1. HIPAA and what institutional review boards (IRBs) do not have to review. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Dec; 18(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 15027429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Institutional review boards and the new privacy rule. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Sep; 16(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11833565 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New privacy rule has more tasks for IRBs. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Feb; 16(2):4. PubMed ID: 12530379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Institutional review boards and the privacy of human research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Aug; 17(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 12731492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The use and disclosure of protected health information for research under the HIPAA privacy rule: unrealized patient autonomy and burdensome government regulation. Tovino SA S D Law Rev; 2004; 49(3):447-502. PubMed ID: 16493842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. New review burdens will affect many institutional review boards (IRBs). Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2001 Jul; 16(7):9. PubMed ID: 11933956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What should IRBs consider when applying the privacy rule to research? Gerlach JW Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2002 Sep; 12(3):299-303. PubMed ID: 12472082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of the new federal medical-privacy rule on research. Kulynych J; Korn D N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 11796857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Balancing privacy protections with efficient research: institutional review boards and the use of certificates of confidentiality. Currie PM IRB; 2005; 27(5):7-12. PubMed ID: 16425475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. "Exempt" research after the privacy rule. Barnes M; Gallin KE IRB; 2003; 25(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 14649247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical privacy and medical research--judging the new federal regulations. Annas GJ N Engl J Med; 2002 Jan; 346(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 11796863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Standards for privacy of individually identifiable health information. HIPAA implementation. Kans Nurse; 2003 Jan; 78(1):4-11Stand. PubMed ID: 12723566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Institutional review boards (IRBs) failed to use steps to protect vulnerable research subjects. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2003 Jun; 18(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 15119342 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research. Noah BA J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Research subject privacy protection in otolaryngology. Noone MC; Walters KC; Gillespie MB Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2004 Mar; 130(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 15023831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Continued concern: human subject protection, the institutional review board, and continuing review. Hoffman S Tenn Law Rev; 2001; 68(4):725-70. PubMed ID: 16189912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Privacy bill under fire from researchers. Wadman M Nature; 1998 Mar; 392(6671):6. PubMed ID: 9510231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The IRB process needs to be reexamined. Esaki R; Macario A; Harrison TK; Brock-Utne JG Anesth Analg; 2011 May; 112(5):1249-50. PubMed ID: 21515655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. State regulation of pharmaceutical clinical trials. Gibbs JN Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(2):265-85. PubMed ID: 15298012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Uncovering the relationship between IRBs and the HIPAA privacy rule. Gilles K J AHIMA; 2004; 75(10):48-9, 52; quiz 55-6. PubMed ID: 15559839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]