These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Explaining public resistance to genetically modified corn: an analysis of the distribution of benefits and risks. Wu F Risk Anal; 2004 Jun; 24(3):715-26. PubMed ID: 15209940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of the safety of foods derived from genetically modified (GM) crops. König A; Cockburn A; Crevel RW; Debruyne E; Grafstroem R; Hammerling U; Kimber I; Knudsen I; Kuiper HA; Peijnenburg AA; Penninks AH; Poulsen M; Schauzu M; Wal JM Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1047-88. PubMed ID: 15123382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychosocial and cultural factors affecting the perceived risk of genetically modified food: an overview of the literature. Finucane ML; Holup JL Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(7):1603-12. PubMed ID: 15652691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chinese public understanding of the use of agricultural biotechnology--a case study from Zhejiang Province of China. Lü L J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2006 Apr; 7(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 16532526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Who does the public trust? The case of genetically modified food in the United States. Lang JT; Hallman WK Risk Anal; 2005 Oct; 25(5):1241-52. PubMed ID: 16297228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes of agricultural scientists in Indonesia towards genetically modified foods. Februhartanty J; Widyastuti TN; Iswarawanti DN Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2007; 16(2):375-80. PubMed ID: 17468097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Asian perspective on GMO and biotechnology issues. Teng PP Asia Pac J Clin Nutr; 2008; 17 Suppl 1():237-40. PubMed ID: 18296345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An empirical test of competing theories of hazard-related trust: the case of GM food. Allum N Risk Anal; 2007 Aug; 27(4):935-46. PubMed ID: 17958502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Genetically modified organisms in the United States: implementation, concerns, and public perception. Oeschger MP; Silva CE Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2007; 107():57-68. PubMed ID: 17522820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Rejection of gene food in Europe is not rational]. Teeri T Duodecim; 2009; 125(24):2697-703. PubMed ID: 20175322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Awareness, acceptance of and willingness to buy genetically modified foods in Urban China. Huang J; Qiu H; Bai J; Pray C Appetite; 2006 Mar; 46(2):144-51. PubMed ID: 16469414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk assessment of genetically modified crops for nutrition and health. Magaña-Gómez JA; de la Barca AM Nutr Rev; 2009 Jan; 67(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 19146501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Use of a risk communication model to evaluate dietetics professionals' viewpoints on genetically engineered foods and crops. Roberts KS; Struble MB; McCullum-Gomez C; Wilkins JL J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 May; 106(5):719-27. PubMed ID: 16647331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety assessment, detection and traceability, and societal aspects of genetically modified foods. European Network on Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Food Crops (ENTRANSFOOD). Concluding remarks. Kuiper HA; König A; Kleter GA; Hammes WP; Knudsen I; Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jul; 42(7):1195-202. PubMed ID: 15123387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical reflections on herbicide-resistant crops. Madsen KH; Sandøe P Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Mar; 61(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 15627240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]