776 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15028301)
1. Intraoperative margin assessment and re-excision rate in breast conserving surgery.
Fleming FJ; Hill AD; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; O'Higgins NJ; Quinn CM
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Apr; 30(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 15028301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Optimal use of re-excision in patients diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer by excisional biopsy treated with breast-conserving therapy.
Caughran JL; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Dekhne NS; Benitez PR; Goldstein NS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Nov; 16(11):3020-7. PubMed ID: 19636632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A two-millimetre free margin from invasive tumour minimises residual disease in breast-conserving surgery.
Ward ST; Jones BG; Jewkes AJ
Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Nov; 64(12):1675-80. PubMed ID: 20946273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Does intraductal breast cancer spread in a segmental distribution? An analysis of residual tumour burden following segmental mastectomy using tumour bed biopsies.
Jenkinson AD; Al-Mufti RA; Mohsen Y; Berry MJ; Wells C; Carpenter R
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2001 Feb; 27(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 11237487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors affecting successful breast conservation for ductal carcinoma in situ.
Dillon MF; Mc Dermott EW; O'Doherty A; Quinn CM; Hill AD; O'Higgins N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1618-28. PubMed ID: 17443388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sampling of secondary margins decreases the need for re-excision after partial mastectomy.
Guidroz JA; Larrieux G; Liao J; Sugg SL; Scott-Conner CE; Weigel RJ
Surgery; 2011 Oct; 150(4):802-9. PubMed ID: 22000194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A pathologic assessment of adequate margin status in breast-conserving therapy.
Dillon MF; Hill AD; Quinn CM; McDermott EW; O'Higgins N
Ann Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 16474911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of margin assessment by radial and shave sections in wide local excision specimens for invasive carcinoma of the breast.
Hodi Z; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Pinder SE; Donovan G; Macmillan RD; Lee AH
Histopathology; 2010 Apr; 56(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 20459567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of additional tumor cavity sampling at the time of breast-conserving surgery on final margin status, volume of resection, and pathologist workload.
Rizzo M; Iyengar R; Gabram SG; Park J; Birdsong G; Chandler KL; Mosunjac MB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):228-34. PubMed ID: 19636625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors predisposing to cavity margin positivity following conservation surgery for breast cancer.
Keskek M; Kothari M; Ardehali B; Betambeau N; Nasiri N; Gui GP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2004 Dec; 30(10):1058-64. PubMed ID: 15522551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Second operation more frequent following breast-conserving treatment for invasive lobular than for invasive non-lobular carcinoma].
de Zeeuw S; Wildenberg F; Strobbe L; Wobbes T
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2009; 153():A56. PubMed ID: 19900317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of re-excision for positive and close resection margins in patients treated with breast-conserving surgery.
Biglia N; Ponzone R; Bounous VE; Mariani LL; Maggiorotto F; Benevelli C; Liberale V; Ottino MC; Sismondi P
Breast; 2014 Dec; 23(6):870-5. PubMed ID: 25305040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
