72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1502864)
1. B scanning evaluation of irritant reactions with binary transformation and image analysis.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 175():9-13. PubMed ID: 1502864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. B scanning evaluation of allergic reactions with binary transformation and image analysis.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 175():3-7. PubMed ID: 1502863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Echographic evaluation with image analysis of irritant reactions induced by nonanoic acid and hydrochloric acid.
Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Sep; 31(3):146-50. PubMed ID: 7821005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of topical corticosteroid activity on experimentally induced contact dermatitis: echographic evaluation with binary transformation and image analysis.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A; Giannetti A
Skin Pharmacol; 1993; 6(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 8352953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reactivity to nickel sulfate at sodium lauryl sulfate pretreated skin sites is higher in atopics: an echographic evaluation by means of image analysis performed on 20 MHz B-scan recordings.
Seidenari S
Acta Derm Venereol; 1994 Jul; 74(4):245-9. PubMed ID: 7976078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of skin occlusion in patch testing with sodium lauryl sulphate.
Friebe K; Effendy I; Löffler H
Br J Dermatol; 2003 Jan; 148(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 12534596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Objective assessment of the minimal irritant reaction induced by a 70% solution of glycolic acid.
Mantovani L; Belletti B; Seidenari S
Skin Res Technol; 1997 Nov; 3(4):222-6. PubMed ID: 27333579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noninvasive measuring methods for the investigation of irritant patch test reactions. A study of patients with hand eczema, atopic dermatitis and controls.
Agner T
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1992; 173():1-26. PubMed ID: 1636360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cutaneous reactivity to allergens at 24-h increases from the antecubital fossa to the wrist: an echographic evaluation by means of a new image analysis system.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A
Contact Dermatitis; 1992 Mar; 26(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 1505182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-treatment of nickel test areas with sodium lauryl sulfate detects nickel sensitivity in subjects reacting negatively to routinely performed patch tests.
Seidenari S; Motolese A; Belletti B
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Feb; 34(2):88-92. PubMed ID: 8681564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study.
Fluhr JW; Bankova L; Fuchs S; Kelterer D; Schliemann-Willers S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15541082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasound description and quantification of irritant reactions induced by dithranol at different concentrations. A comparison with visual assessment and colorimetric measurements.
Schiavi ME; Belletti B; Seidenari S
Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Apr; 34(4):272-7. PubMed ID: 8730166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Potential for irritation increases from the wrist to the cubital fossa.
Van der Valk PG; Maibach HI
Br J Dermatol; 1989 Dec; 121(6):709-12. PubMed ID: 2611122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skin reaction and recovery: a repeated sodium lauryl sulphate patch test vs. a 24-h patch test and tape stripping.
Koopman DG; Kezić S; Verberk MM
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Mar; 150(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 15030332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrasound B scanning with image analysis for assessment of allergic patch test reactions.
Seidenari S; Di Nardo A; Pepe P; Giannetti A
Contact Dermatitis; 1991 Mar; 24(3):216-22. PubMed ID: 1868705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
