191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15028813)
1. Maximal flow rates possible during power injection through currently available PICCs: an in vitro study.
Salis AI; Eclavea A; Johnson MS; Patel NH; Wong DG; Tennery G
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Mar; 15(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 15028813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Power injection of peripherally inserted central catheters.
Rivitz SM; Drucker EA
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(5):857-63. PubMed ID: 9314379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Power injection of contrast media via peripherally inserted central catheters for CT.
Coyle D; Bloomgarden D; Beres R; Patel S; Sane S; Hurst E
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2004 Aug; 15(8):809-14. PubMed ID: 15297584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In-line pressures generated in small-bore central venous catheters during power injection of CT contrast media.
Ruess L; Bulas DI; Rivera O; Markle BM
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 9169679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the adequacy of peripherally inserted central catheters for power injection of intravenous contrast agents for CT.
Williamson EE; McKinney JM
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2001; 25(6):932-7. PubMed ID: 11711806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Central venous catheter integrity during mechanical power injection of iodinated contrast medium.
Macha DB; Nelson RC; Howle LE; Hollingsworth JW; Schindera ST
Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):870-8. PubMed ID: 19789224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow characteristics of peripherally inserted central catheters.
Angle JF; Matsumoto AH; Skalak TC; O'Brien RF; Hartwell GD; Tegtmeyer CJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1997; 8(4):569-77. PubMed ID: 9232572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective randomized comparative evaluation of proximal valve polyurethane and distal valve silicone peripherally inserted central catheters.
Ong CK; Venkatesh SK; Lau GB; Wang SC
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Aug; 21(8):1191-6. PubMed ID: 20598573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Injection rate threshold of triple-lumen central venous catheters: an in vitro study.
Zamos DT; Emch TM; Patton HA; D'Amico FJ; Bansal SK
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):574-8. PubMed ID: 17434071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Power injection of intravenous contrast material through central venous catheters for CT: in vitro evaluation.
Herts BR; Cohen MA; McInroy B; Davros WJ; Zepp RC; Einstein DM
Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):731-5. PubMed ID: 8756923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing the use of silicone and polyurethane Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in newborns: A retrospective study.
Gomes de Souza NM; Silveira Rocha R; Pinheiro Ferreira R; Bastos da Silveira Reis C; Souza Bandeira RS; Façanha Melo AP
J Clin Nurs; 2021 Dec; 30(23-24):3439-3447. PubMed ID: 34545654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two types of catheters through femoral vein catheterization in patients with lung cancer undergoing chemotherapy: A retrospective study.
Xu B; Zhang J; Tang S; Hou J; Ma M
J Vasc Access; 2018 Nov; 19(6):651-657. PubMed ID: 29701120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A prospective, randomized comparison of three different types of valved and non-valved peripherally inserted central catheters.
Pittiruti M; Emoli A; Porta P; Marche B; DeAngelis R; Scoppettuolo G
J Vasc Access; 2014; 15(6):519-23. PubMed ID: 25198813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Injection of gadolinium contrast through pediatric central venous catheters: a safety study.
Moriarty JM; Kung GL; Ramos Y; Moghaddam AN; Ennis DB; Finn JP
Pediatr Radiol; 2012 Sep; 42(9):1064-9. PubMed ID: 22526282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of silicone and polyurethane PICC lines and postinsertion complication rates: a systematic review.
Seckold T; Walker S; Dwyer T
J Vasc Access; 2015; 16(3):167-77. PubMed ID: 25634150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemodialysis catheter integrity during mechanical power injection of iodinated contrast medium for computed tomography angiography.
Schwartz FR; Lewis DS; King AE; Murphy FG; Howle LE; Kim CY; Nelson RC
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jun; 46(6):2961-2967. PubMed ID: 33386919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bursting pressure of triple-lumen central venous catheters under static and dynamic loads.
Beckingham T; Roberts A; St John A; O'Callaghan G
J Vasc Access; 2017 Sep; 18(5):430-435. PubMed ID: 28777405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Contrast media pressure injection using a portal catheter system--results of an in vitro study].
Gebauer B; Teichgräber UK; Hothan T; Felix R; Wagner HJ
Rofo; 2005 Oct; 177(10):1417-23. PubMed ID: 16170712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and feasibility of using a central venous catheter for rapid contrast injection rates.
Sanelli PC; Deshmukh M; Ougorets I; Caiati R; Heier LA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Dec; 183(6):1829-34. PubMed ID: 15547237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Silicone and polyurethane tunneled infusion catheters: a comparison of durability and breakage rates.
Cohen AB; Dagli M; Stavropoulos SW; Mondschein JI; Soulen MC; Shlansky-Goldberg RD; Solomon JA; Chittams JL; Trerotola SO
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2011 May; 22(5):638-41. PubMed ID: 21514517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
