These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15029915)

  • 1. Biomechanical evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation: a comparison of the Roy-Camille and Magerl screw techniques.
    Barrey C; Mertens P; Rumelhart C; Cotton F; Jund J; Perrin G
    J Neurosurg; 2004 Mar; 100(3 Suppl Spine):268-76. PubMed ID: 15029915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantitative anatomic evaluation of cervical lateral mass fixation with a comparison of the Roy-Camille and the Magerl screw techniques.
    Barrey C; Mertens P; Jund J; Cotton F; Perrin G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(6):E140-7. PubMed ID: 15770166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A biomechanical evaluation of three revision screw strategies for failed lateral mass fixation.
    Hostin RA; Wu C; Perra JH; Polly DW; Akesen B; Wroblewski JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(22):2415-21. PubMed ID: 18923316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Flexion failure of posterior cervical lateral mass screws. Influence of insertion technique and position.
    Choueka J; Spivak JM; Kummer FJ; Steger T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(4):462-8. PubMed ID: 8658250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative anatomy of subaxial cervical lateral mass: an analysis of safe screw lengths for Roy-Camille and magerl techniques.
    Stemper BD; Marawar SV; Yoganandan N; Shender BS; Rao RD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(8):893-7. PubMed ID: 18404109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
    Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Safe lateral-mass screw lengths in the Roy-Camille and Magerl techniques. An anatomic study.
    Ebraheim NA; Klausner T; Xu R; Yeasting RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Aug; 23(16):1739-42. PubMed ID: 9728374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Insertional Torque in Cervical Vertebrae Lateral Mass Screw Fixation: Magerl Technique Versus Roy-Camille Technique.
    Shinohara A; Sairyo K; Mishiro T; Chikawa T; Soshi S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Oct; 30(8):E1156-E1159. PubMed ID: 27623298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting lateral mass screw placement at C-7.
    Abdullah KG; Nowacki AS; Steinmetz MP; Wang JC; Mroz TE
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Mar; 14(3):405-11. PubMed ID: 21235304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lateral radiologic evaluation of lateral mass screw placement in the cervical spine.
    Ebraheim NA; Tremains MR; Xu R; Yeasting RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Feb; 23(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 9516701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cervical transfacet versus lateral mass screws: a biomechanical comparison.
    Klekamp JW; Ugbo JL; Heller JG; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord; 2000 Dec; 13(6):515-8. PubMed ID: 11132983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of three different cervical lateral mass screw fixation techniques by complications and bicortical purchase : cadaveric study.
    Baek JW; Park DM; Kim DH
    J Korean Neurosurg Soc; 2010 Sep; 48(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 21082044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pullout strength comparison of two methods of orienting screw insertion in the lateral masses of the bovine cervical spine.
    Errico T; Uhl R; Cooper P; Casar R; McHenry T
    J Spinal Disord; 1992 Dec; 5(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 1490044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristics of unicortical and bicortical lateral mass screws in the cervical spine.
    Seybold EA; Baker JA; Criscitiello AA; Ordway NR; Park CK; Connolly PJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Nov; 24(22):2397-403. PubMed ID: 10586467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors affecting the interface of cervical spine facet screws placed in the technique by Roy-Camille et al.
    Pitzen TR; Zenner S; Barbier D; Georg T; Steudel WI
    Eur Spine J; 2004 Oct; 13(6):524-9. PubMed ID: 15048563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical spine pedicle screws: a biomechanical comparison of two insertion techniques.
    Kowalski JM; Ludwig SC; Hutton WC; Heller JG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Nov; 25(22):2865-7. PubMed ID: 11074671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities.
    Ma XY; Yin QS; Wu ZH; Xia H; Liu JF; Xiang M; Zhao WD; Zhong SZ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 19214096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of cemented rescue screws for anterior cervical plate fixation.
    Pitzen TR; Drumm J; Bruchmann B; Barbier DD; Steudel WI
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Jan; 4(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16506467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Four lateral mass screw fixation techniques in lower cervical spine following laminectomy: a finite element analysis study of stress distribution.
    Song M; Zhang Z; Lu M; Zong J; Dong C; Ma K; Wang S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Aug; 13():115. PubMed ID: 25106498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the pullout strength of self-drilling and self-tapping anterior cervical screws.
    Hitchon PW; Brenton MD; Coppes JK; From AM; Torner JC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jan; 28(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 12544947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.