These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15030088)

  • 1. Laboratory assessment of three glucometers.
    Ajala MO; Oladipo OO; Fasanmade O; Adewole TA
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2003 Sep; 32(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 15030088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Current portable blood sugar analysis equipment--comparison of the MediSense Card, Glucometer Elite, Hypocount Supreme and Omnican Control with the glucose oxidase reference method].
    Weitgasser R; Gappmayer B
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1997 Jan; 127(1-2):12-7. PubMed ID: 9036524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of glucose dehydrogenase (GDH) based and glucose oxidase (GOX) based blood glucose meter systems at moderately high altitude.
    Bilen H; Kilicaslan A; Akcay G; Albayrak F
    J Med Eng Technol; 2007; 31(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 17365439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of hematocrit on accuracy of two point-of-care glucometers for use in dogs.
    Paul AE; Shiel RE; Juvet F; Mooney CT; Mansfield CS
    Am J Vet Res; 2011 Sep; 72(9):1204-8. PubMed ID: 21879978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative accuracy of glucose monitors.
    Fanghänel G; Sanchez-Reyes L; Morales M; Torres E; Chavira J; Sotres D; Valles V
    Arch Med Res; 1998; 29(4):325-9. PubMed ID: 9887551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Evaluation of GLUCOCARD X-METER glucose monitoring system].
    Kwon MJ; Lee SY
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Feb; 28(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 18309250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of "point of care" devices in the measurement of low blood glucose in neonatal practice.
    Ho HT; Yeung WK; Young BW
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2004 Jul; 89(4):F356-9. PubMed ID: 15210675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Clinical evaluation of the blood glucose monitors Accutrend, Companion 2, Glucometer 3 and One Touch II in comparison with the glucose oxidase reference method].
    Weitgasser R; Straberger A; Schnöll F; Sailer S
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1994; 106(23):738-41. PubMed ID: 7856178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of several point-of-care testing (POCT) glucometers with an established laboratory procedure for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes using the discordance rate. A new statistical approach.
    Püntmann I; Wosniok W; Haeckel R
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2003 Jun; 41(6):809-20. PubMed ID: 12880146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laboratory assessment of five glucose meters designed for self-monitoring of blood glucose concentration.
    Devreese K; Leroux-Roels G
    Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1993 Dec; 31(12):829-37. PubMed ID: 8136415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of adverse storage conditions on performance of glucometer test strips.
    Bamberg R; Schulman K; MacKenzie M; Moore J; Olchesky S
    Clin Lab Sci; 2005; 18(4):203-9. PubMed ID: 16315736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of five devices for self-monitoring of blood glucose in the normoglycaemic range.
    Glasmacher AG; Brennemann W; Hahn C; Marko C; Wehnert S; Löhr U; Kutschkow R
    Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes; 1998; 106(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 9792471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Error rates resulting from anemia can be corrected in multiple commonly used point-of-care glucometers.
    Mann EA; Salinas J; Pidcoke HF; Wolf SE; Holcomb JB; Wade CE
    J Trauma; 2008 Jan; 64(1):15-20; discussion 20-1. PubMed ID: 18188093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Plasma-equivalent glucose at the point-of-care: evaluation of Roche Accu-Chek Inform and Abbott Precision PCx glucose meters.
    Ghys T; Goedhuys W; Spincemaille K; Gorus F; Gerlo E
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007; 386(1-2):63-8. PubMed ID: 17727831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Results of selfmonitoring on glucometer systems Advance and Optium in daily routine.
    Chlup R; Payne M; Zapletalová J; Komenda S; Doubravová B; Reznícková M; Chlupová L; Seckar P
    Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub; 2005 Jun; 149(1):127-39. PubMed ID: 16170399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An accurate amperometric glucose sensor based glucometer with eliminated cross-sensitivity.
    Bani Amer MM
    J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(5):208-13. PubMed ID: 12487712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy of the One Touch II whole blood glucose analyzer when used by analysts with diverse technical backgrounds.
    Naito HK; Kwak YS; Cottingham C
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Aug; 37(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 8336096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of three blood glucose meters.
    Rheney CC; Kirk JK
    Ann Pharmacother; 2000 Mar; 34(3):317-21. PubMed ID: 10917376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Blood glucose determinations in newborns: four instruments compared.
    Schlebusch H; Niesen M; Sorger M; Paffenholz I; Fahnenstich H
    Pediatr Pathol Lab Med; 1998; 18(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 9566281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of roche accu-chek inform whole blood capillary, arterial, and venous glucose values in patients receiving intensive intravenous insulin therapy after cardiac surgery.
    Karon BS; Gandhi GY; Nuttall GA; Bryant SC; Schaff HV; McMahon MM; Santrach PJ
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jun; 127(6):919-26. PubMed ID: 17509989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.