These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15030108)

  • 1. A strict response criterion yields a mirror effect in the novelty paradigm.
    Aberg CS; Nilsson LG
    Scand J Psychol; 2003 Dec; 44(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 15030108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The novelty effect: support for the Novelty-Encoding Hypothesis.
    Kormi-Nouri R; Nilsson LG; Ohta N
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Apr; 46(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 15762941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facilitation of source discrimination in the novelty effect.
    Aberg C; Nilsson LG
    Scand J Psychol; 2001 Sep; 42(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 11547910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The variance theory of the mirror effect in recognition memory.
    Sikström S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Sep; 8(3):408-38. PubMed ID: 11700894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. More ways than one: ERPs reveal multiple familiarity signals in the word frequency mirror effect.
    Bridger EK; Bader R; Mecklinger A
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 May; 57():179-90. PubMed ID: 24675676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory.
    Heathcote A; Ditton E; Mitchell K
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):826-38. PubMed ID: 17063914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation.
    Arndt J; Reder LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Sep; 28(5):830-42. PubMed ID: 12219793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Strength-based mirror effects in item and associative recognition: evidence for within-list criterion changes.
    Hockley WE; Niewiadomski MW
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Jun; 35(4):679-88. PubMed ID: 17848026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory.
    Criss AH; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Jul; 30(4):778-86. PubMed ID: 15238022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigating strength and frequency effects in recognition memory using type-2 signal detection theory.
    Higham PA; Perfect TJ; Bruno D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-80. PubMed ID: 19210081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feature frequency effects in recognition memory.
    Malmberg KJ; Steyvers M; Stephens JD; Shiffrin RM
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):607-13. PubMed ID: 12184562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A mega recognition memory study of 2897 disyllabic words.
    Cortese MJ; McCarty DP; Schock J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(8):1489-501. PubMed ID: 25220011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A bias in favor of the positive response to high-frequency words in recognition memory.
    Hoshino Y
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Nov; 19(6):607-16. PubMed ID: 1758305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On the difference between strength-based and frequency-based mirror effects in recognition memory.
    Stretch V; Wixted JT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Nov; 24(6):1379-96. PubMed ID: 9835059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling the effects of verbal and nonverbal pair strength on associative recognition.
    Xu J; Malmberg KJ
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Apr; 35(3):526-44. PubMed ID: 17691151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Recognition memory for 2,578 monosyllabic words.
    Cortese MJ; Khanna MM; Hacker S
    Memory; 2010 Aug; 18(6):595-609. PubMed ID: 20677075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception and recognition memory of words and werds: two-way mirror effects.
    Becker DV; Goldinger SD; Stone GO
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Oct; 34(7):1495-511. PubMed ID: 17263074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revisiting the novelty effect: when familiarity, not novelty, enhances memory.
    Poppenk J; Köhler S; Moscovitch M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1321-30. PubMed ID: 20804299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Signal detection theory analyses of semantic priming in word recognition.
    Pastore RE; Crawley E; Skelly MA; Berens MS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2003 Dec; 29(6):1251-66. PubMed ID: 14640842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory encoding and hippocampally-based novelty/familiarity discrimination networks.
    Habib R; McIntosh AR; Wheeler MA; Tulving E
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 12457753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.