These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15030827)

  • 1. Comparison of manual and automated methods to determine horizontal corneal diameter.
    Baumeister M; Terzi E; Ekici Y; Kohnen T
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Feb; 30(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 15030827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internal anterior chamber diameter using optical coherence tomography compared with white-to-white distances using automated measurements.
    Kohnen T; Thomala MC; Cichocki M; Strenger A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 Nov; 32(11):1809-13. PubMed ID: 17081862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corneal diameter measurements by corneal topography and angle-to-angle measurements by optical coherence tomography: evaluation of equivalence.
    Piñero DP; Plaza Puche AB; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):126-31. PubMed ID: 18165092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation of infrared pupillometers and CCD-camera imaging from aberrometry and videokeratography for determining scotopic pupil size.
    Kohnen T; Terzi E; Kasper T; Kohnen EM; Bühren J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Oct; 30(10):2116-23. PubMed ID: 15474824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices.
    Shirayama M; Wang L; Weikert MP; Koch DD
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 148(4):528-535.e1. PubMed ID: 19541287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement among 3 methods to measure corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography.
    Li EY; Mohamed S; Leung CK; Rao SK; Cheng AC; Cheung CY; Lam DS
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Oct; 114(10):1842-7. PubMed ID: 17507097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Anterior segment biometry with the Pentacam: comprehensive assessment of repeatability of automated measurements.
    Shankar H; Taranath D; Santhirathelagan CT; Pesudovs K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 34(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 18165089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of corneal thickness on the agreement between ultrasound and Orbscan II pachymetry.
    Hashemi H; Roshani M; Mehravaran S; Parsafar H; Yazdani K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1694-700. PubMed ID: 17889762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability of noncontact pachymetry after laser in situ keratomileusis.
    Maldonado MJ; López-Miguel A; Nieto JC; Cano-Parra J; Calvo B; Alió JL
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4135-41. PubMed ID: 19357360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Horizontal Corneal Diameter Measurements Using Orbscan IIz, OPD Scan III, and IOLMaster 700.
    Cruz S; Valenzuela F; Stoppel J; Maul E; Gibbons A
    Eye Contact Lens; 2021 Oct; 47(10):533-538. PubMed ID: 33900214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Horizontal corneal diameter measurements using the Orbscan IIz and Pentacam HR systems.
    Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Khodaman AR
    Cornea; 2013 Nov; 32(11):1460-4. PubMed ID: 24055904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the relationship between corneal diameter and lens diameter.
    Khng C; Osher RH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Mar; 34(3):475-9. PubMed ID: 18299075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of Orbscan II topography measurements in relation to refractive status.
    Rabsilber TM; Becker KA; Auffarth GU
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1607-13. PubMed ID: 16129300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Eyemetrics and Orbscan automated method to determine horizontal corneal diameter.
    Venkataraman A; Mardi SK; Pillai S
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2010; 58(3):219-22. PubMed ID: 20413925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of three methods of measuring corneal thickness and anterior chamber depth.
    Buehl W; Stojanac D; Sacu S; Drexler W; Findl O
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 141(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 16386970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central corneal thickness measurement with Pentacam, Orbscan II, and ultrasound devices before and after laser refractive surgery for myopia.
    Hashemi H; Mehravaran S
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Oct; 33(10):1701-7. PubMed ID: 17889763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. White-to-white corneal diameter differences in moderately and highly myopic eyes: partial coherence interferometry versus scanning-slit topography.
    Martin R; Ortiz S; Rio-Cristobal A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 39(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 23415065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flap dimensions created with the Hansatome microkeratome: correlation with Orbscan-derived anterior segment data.
    Ozdamar A; Kucuksumer Y; Devranoglu K
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Aug; 31(8):1614-7. PubMed ID: 16129301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison and evaluation of ocular biometry using a new noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer.
    Rohrer K; Frueh BE; Wälti R; Clemetson IA; Tappeiner C; Goldblum D
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Nov; 116(11):2087-92. PubMed ID: 19744720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Central corneal thickness measurements with partial coherence interferometry, ultrasound, and the Orbscan system.
    Rainer G; Findl O; Petternel V; Kiss B; Drexler W; Skorpik C; Georgopoulos M; Schmetterer L
    Ophthalmology; 2004 May; 111(5):875-9. PubMed ID: 15121362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.