These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15031314)

  • 1. A minimum data set prevalence of pain quality indicator: is it accurate and does it reflect differences in care processes?
    Cadogan MP; Schnelle JF; Yamamoto-Mitani N; Cabrera G; Simmons SF
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2004 Mar; 59(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 15031314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The minimum data set weight-loss quality indicator: does it reflect differences in care processes related to weight loss?
    Simmons SF; Garcia ET; Cadogan MP; Al-Samarrai NR; Levy-Storms LF; Osterweil D; Schnelle JF
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2003 Oct; 51(10):1410-8. PubMed ID: 14511161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The minimum data set depression quality indicator: does it reflect differences in care processes?
    Simmons SF; Cadogan MP; Cabrera GR; Al-Samarrai NR; Jorge JS; Levy-Storms L; Osterweil D; Schnelle JF
    Gerontologist; 2004 Aug; 44(4):554-64. PubMed ID: 15331813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The minimum data set urinary incontinence quality indicators: do they reflect differences in care processes related to incontinence?
    Schnelle JF; Cadogan MP; Yoshii J; Al-Samarrai NR; Osterweil D; Bates-Jensen BM; Simmons SF
    Med Care; 2003 Aug; 41(8):909-22. PubMed ID: 12886171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The minimum data set pressure ulcer indicator: does it reflect differences in care processes related to pressure ulcer prevention and treatment in nursing homes?
    Bates-Jensen BM; Cadogan M; Osterweil D; Levy-Storms L; Jorge J; Al-Samarrai N; Grbic V; Schnelle JF
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2003 Sep; 51(9):1203-12. PubMed ID: 12919231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The quality of the quality indicator of pain derived from the minimum data set.
    Wu N; Miller SC; Lapane K; Roy J; Mor V
    Health Serv Res; 2005 Aug; 40(4):1197-216. PubMed ID: 16033500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A standardized quality assessment system to evaluate pain detection and management in the nursing home.
    Cadogan MP; Schnelle JF; Al-Sammarrai NR; Yamamoto-Mitani N; Cabrera G; Osterweil D; Simmons SF
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2005; 6(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15871864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The minimum data set prevalence of restraint quality indicator: does it reflect differences in care?
    Schnelle JF; Bates-Jensen BM; Levy-Storms L; Grbic V; Yoshii J; Cadogan M; Simmons SF
    Gerontologist; 2004 Apr; 44(2):245-55. PubMed ID: 15075421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A standardized quality assessment system to evaluate pain detection and management in the nursing home.
    Cadogan MP; Schnelle JF; Al-Sammarrai NR; Yamamoto-Mitani N; Cabrera G; Osterweil D; Simmons SF
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2006 Mar; 7(3 Suppl):S11-9, S10. PubMed ID: 16500269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement sensitivity and the Minimum Data Set depression quality indicator.
    Schnelle JF; Wood S; Schnelle ER; Simmons SF
    Gerontologist; 2001 Jun; 41(3):401-5. PubMed ID: 11405438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring pain presence and intensity in nursing home residents.
    Lin WC; Lum TY; Mehr DR; Kane RL
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2006 Mar; 7(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 16503307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the minimum data set to select nursing home residents for interview about pain.
    Chu L; Schnelle JF; Cadogan MP; Simmons SF
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2004 Dec; 52(12):2057-61. PubMed ID: 15571542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Falls documentation in nursing homes: agreement between the minimum data set and chart abstractions of medical and nursing documentation.
    Hill-Westmoreland EE; Gruber-Baldini AL
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 Feb; 53(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 15673351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Making the investment count: revision of the Minimum Data Set for nursing homes, MDS 3.0.
    Saliba D; Buchanan J
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2012 Sep; 13(7):602-10. PubMed ID: 22795345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Daily pain that was excruciating at some time in the previous week: prevalence, characteristics, and outcomes in nursing home residents.
    Teno JM; Kabumoto G; Wetle T; Roy J; Mor V
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2004 May; 52(5):762-7. PubMed ID: 15086658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy and bias of licensed practical nurse and nursing assistant ratings of nursing home residents' pain.
    Engle VF; Graney MJ; Chan A
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2001 Jul; 56(7):M405-11. PubMed ID: 11445599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pain Trajectories of Nursing Home Residents Nearing Death.
    Thompson GN; Doupe M; Reid RC; Baumbusch J; Estabrooks CA
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2017 Aug; 18(8):700-706. PubMed ID: 28431914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The adequacy of the minimum data set assessment of pain in cognitively impaired nursing home residents.
    Cohen-Mansfield J
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2004 Apr; 27(4):343-51. PubMed ID: 15050662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How well does the minimum data set measure healthcare use? a validation study.
    Doupe MB; Poss J; Norton PG; Garland A; Dik N; Zinnick S; Lix LM
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Apr; 18(1):279. PubMed ID: 29642929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality assessment in nursing homes by systematic direct observation: feeding assistance.
    Simmons SF; Babineau S; Garcia E; Schnelle JF
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 2002 Oct; 57(10):M665-71. PubMed ID: 12242322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.