These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15032779)
1. Loglinear models for the robust design in mark-recapture experiments. Rivest LP; Daigle G Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):100-7. PubMed ID: 15032779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Applications and extensions of Chao's moment estimator for the size of a closed population. Rivest LP; Baillargeon S Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):999-1006. PubMed ID: 17425635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A likelihood-based approach to capture-recapture estimation of demographic parameters under the robust design. Kendall WL; Pollock KH; Brownie C Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):293-308. PubMed ID: 7766783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: II. Jolly-Seber model. Pledger S; Pollock KH; Norris JL Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):883-90. PubMed ID: 19930186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A class of latent Markov models for capture-recapture data allowing for time, heterogeneity, and behavior effects. Bartolucci F; Pennoni F Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):568-78. PubMed ID: 17688509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Semiparametric estimation of animal abundance using capture-recapture data from open populations. Huggins R Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):684-90. PubMed ID: 16984308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robust estimation of population size in closed animal populations from capture-recapture experiments. Pollock KH; Otto MC Biometrics; 1983 Dec; 39(4):1035-49. PubMed ID: 6671118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A bayesian approach to the multistate Jolly-Seber capture-recapture model. Dupuis JA; Schwarz CJ Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1015-22. PubMed ID: 17501941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimating population size via sample coverage for closed capture-recapture models. Lee SM; Chao A Biometrics; 1994 Mar; 50(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 19480084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On identifiability in capture-recapture models. Holzmann H; Munk A; Zucchini W Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):934-6; discussion 936-9. PubMed ID: 16984340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A general model for the analysis of mark-resight, mark-recapture, and band-recovery data under tag loss. Conn PB; Kendall WL; Samuel MD Biometrics; 2004 Dec; 60(4):900-9. PubMed ID: 15606410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bayesian methods for multiple capture-recapture surveys. Smith PJ Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):1177-89. PubMed ID: 3233254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A unified likelihood-based approach for estimating population size in continuous-time capture-recapture experiments with frailty. Xi L; Yip PS; Watson R Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):228-36. PubMed ID: 17447949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Modeling association among demographic parameters in analysis of open population capture-recapture data. Link WA; Barker RJ Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 15737077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A continuous time version and a generalization of a Markov-recapture model for trapping experiments. Alpizar-Jara R; Smith CE Math Biosci; 2008; 214(1-2):11-9. PubMed ID: 18556026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]