BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15032792)

  • 1. Exact analysis of dose response for multiple correlated binary outcomes.
    Han KE; Catalano PJ; Senchaudhuri P; Mehta C
    Biometrics; 2004 Mar; 60(1):216-24. PubMed ID: 15032792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exact analysis for paired binary data.
    Hirji KF
    Biometrics; 1994 Dec; 50(4):964-74. PubMed ID: 7787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Generalized confidence intervals for ratios of regression coefficients with applications to bioassays.
    Bebu I; Seillier-Moiseiwitsch F; Mathew T
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):1047-58. PubMed ID: 19894218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A hierarchical Binomial-Poisson model for the analysis of a crossover design for correlated binary data when the number of trials is dose-dependent.
    Shkedy Z; Molenberghs G; Van Craenendonck H; Steckler T; Bijnens L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(2):225-39. PubMed ID: 15796291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing for ordered group effects in binary and continuous outcomes.
    Farrell PJ; Park CG
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):585-98. PubMed ID: 17634976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resampling in multiple-dose factorial designs.
    Frommolt P; Hellmich M
    Biom J; 2009 Dec; 51(6):915-31. PubMed ID: 20029896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An exact trend test for correlated binary data.
    Corcoran C; Ryan L; Senchaudhuri P; Mehta C; Patel N; Molenberghs G
    Biometrics; 2001 Sep; 57(3):941-8. PubMed ID: 11550948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A confidence-limit-based approach to the assessment of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium.
    Wellek S; Goddard KA; Ziegler A
    Biom J; 2010 Apr; 52(2):253-70. PubMed ID: 20394081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two approaches to analyzing correlated binary data in developmental toxicity studies.
    Ten Have TR; Hartzel T
    Teratology; 1995 Nov; 52(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 8838250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confidence interval estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient for binary outcome data.
    Zou G; Donner A
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):807-11. PubMed ID: 15339305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An exact test for detecting inconsistency in readers interpretation over time in screening mammograms.
    Lee JH; Eschrich S; Beam C
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):672-81. PubMed ID: 17638286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlation coefficient inference on censored bioassay data.
    Li L; Wang WW; Chan IS
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(3):501-12. PubMed ID: 15920894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using historical controls in the analysis of developmental toxicity data.
    Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):1126-35. PubMed ID: 8117906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cluster formation as a measure of interpretability in multiple testing.
    Shaffer JP
    Biom J; 2008 Oct; 50(5):852-60. PubMed ID: 18932143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial.
    Bekele BN; Shen Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):343-54. PubMed ID: 16011680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.
    Tang ML; Ling MH; Tian GL
    Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(4):625-41. PubMed ID: 19035467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Design of multiple binary outcome studies with intentionally missing data.
    Williams P; Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1498-514. PubMed ID: 8962465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Global tests for multiple binary outcomes.
    Lefkopoulou M; Ryan L
    Biometrics; 1993 Dec; 49(4):975-88. PubMed ID: 8117908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An exact McNemar test for paired binary Markov chains.
    Smith W; Solow AR
    Biometrics; 1996 Sep; 52(3):1063-70. PubMed ID: 8805767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.