These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15032895)

  • 1. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part I: consistency prior to setting.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 13(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15032895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part III: resistance to compression after setting.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 15610544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study.
    Tejo SK; Kumar AG; Kattimani VS; Desai PD; Nalla S; Chaitanya K K
    Head Face Med; 2012 Oct; 8():27. PubMed ID: 23039395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An investigation of the rheological properties of several interocclusal registration materials.
    Chai J; Leong DK; Pang IC
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Sep; 3(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 7874254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy and dimensional stability of four interocclusal recording materials.
    Balthazar-Hart Y; Sandrik JL; Malone WF; Mazur B; Hart T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1981 Jun; 45(6):586-91. PubMed ID: 6941014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flow profile of regular and fast-setting elastomeric impression materials using a shark fin testing device.
    Lawson NC; Cakir D; Ramp L; Burgess JO
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 21649832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting.
    Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of elastomeric impression materials' thixotropic behavior.
    Tolidis K; Tortopidis D; Gerasimou P; Theocharidou A; Boutsiouki C
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2013 Jun; 21(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 23888530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in properties of nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials after storage of components.
    Hondrum SO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 11174682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials.
    Chai J; Tan E; Pang IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):538-42. PubMed ID: 7748448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal records.
    Vergos VK; Tripodakis AP
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 12956489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A clinical evaluation of materials for interocclusal registration in centric relation.
    Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL; de Mattos MG; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11213793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 5 types of interocclusal recording materials on the accuracy of articulation of digital models.
    Sweeney S; Smith DK; Messersmith M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Aug; 148(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 26232833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of surface moisture on detail reproduction of elastomeric impressions.
    Johnson GH; Lepe X; Aw TC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):354-64. PubMed ID: 14564290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hydrophilicity of unset and set elastomeric impression materials.
    Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(6):552-4. PubMed ID: 21209992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hydrophilicity of elastomeric non-aqueous impression materials during setting.
    Rupp F; Axmann D; Jacobi A; Groten M; Geis-Gerstorfer J
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 15681007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness.
    Walker MP; Alderman N; Petrie CS; Melander J; McGuire J
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 23387301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detail reproduction, contact angles, and die hardness of elastomeric impression and gypsum die material combinations.
    Ragain JC; Grosko ML; Raj M; Ryan TN; Johnston WM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):214-20. PubMed ID: 11203635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Compression resistance of four interocclusal recording materials.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Dec; 68(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 1494111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.