170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15035557)
1. Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear.
Hamzavi J; Pok SM; Gstoettner W; Baumgartner WD
Int J Audiol; 2004 Feb; 43(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 15035557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear.
Hamzavi J; Marcel Pok S; Gstoettner W; Baumgartner WD
Int J Audiol; 2004; 43(2):61-65. PubMed ID: 28793845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech perception benefit for children with a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears and children with bilateral cochlear implants.
Mok M; Galvin KL; Dowell RC; McKay CM
Audiol Neurootol; 2010; 15(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 19468210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
Looi V; McDermott H; McKay C; Hickson L
Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Cochlear implant in patients with residual hearing].
Ruh S; Battmer RD; Strauss-Schier A; Lenarz T
Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Jun; 76(6):347-50. PubMed ID: 9333278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contralateral hearing aid use in cochlear implanted patients: multicenter study of bimodal benefit.
Morera C; Cavalle L; Manrique M; Huarte A; Angel R; Osorio A; Garcia-Ibañez L; Estrada E; Morera-Ballester C
Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Oct; 132(10):1084-94. PubMed ID: 22667256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hearing progress and fluctuations in bimodal-binaural hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aid).
Luntz M; Yehudai N; Shpak T
Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Oct; 127(10):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17851963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants.
Sasaki T; Yamamoto K; Iwaki T; Kubo T
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Oct; 36(5):541-6. PubMed ID: 19297109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fundamental frequency information for speech recognition via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other.
Shpak T; Most T; Luntz M
Ear Hear; 2014; 35(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 24141594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Outcomes of treatment of partial deafness with cochlear implantation: a DUET study.
Lorens A; Polak M; Piotrowska A; Skarzynski H
Laryngoscope; 2008 Feb; 118(2):288-94. PubMed ID: 18000465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensory aids in conjunction with cochlear implants.
Waltzman SB; Cohen NL; Shapiro WH
Am J Otol; 1992 Jul; 13(4):308-12. PubMed ID: 1415491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Speech discrimination in noise for patients with cochlear implants].
Hamzavi J; Adunka O; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2000 Jun; 112(11):498-504. PubMed ID: 10890128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.
Laske RD; Veraguth D; Dillier N; Binkert A; Holzmann D; Huber AM
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
Wolfe J; Baker S; Caraway T; Kasulis H; Mears A; Smith J; Swim L; Wood M
Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 17667768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of low-frequency hearing.
Büchner A; Schüssler M; Battmer RD; Stöver T; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T
Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14 Suppl 1():8-13. PubMed ID: 19390170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perception of suprasegmental speech features via bimodal stimulation: cochlear implant on one ear and hearing aid on the other.
Most T; Harel T; Shpak T; Luntz M
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Apr; 54(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 20844254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
