These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15035943)
1. Mandatory drug testing of high school athletes: unethical evaluation, unethical policy. Louria D Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 15035943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "What is legal is not necessarily ethical": the limits of law and drug-testing programs. Luna E Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15035947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Students as lab animals. Roddey Holder A Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 15035944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Drug-testing research in high school students: is there a will or a way? Koski G Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 15035941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Criticisms of SATURN mirror criticisms of any mandatory student drug-testing policy. Verma AC Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 15035951 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Coercion and the SATURN study. Resnik DB Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 15035945 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Coercion, harm, and complicity in research integrated with mandatory public health programs. Buchanan T Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 15035954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ethics of research involving mandatory drug testing of high school athletes in Oregon. Shamoo AE; Moreno JD Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15035935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spinning SATURN. Eder J Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 15035955 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinician's perspective. Gorton GE Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 15035949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjects. Kopelman LM Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15035950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Required "volunteers" for human investigations--just say no! Cohen PJ Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 15035953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Orbiting SATURN: countering politically-charged misinformation with facts. Chiodo GT; Moe EL; Goldberg L Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15035948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A step toward truly protecting human subjects: reviewing the review boards. Albrecht RR Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 15035952 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A response to commentators on "Ethics of research involving mandatory drug testing of high school athletes in Oregon". Shamoo AE; Moreno JD Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):W29-30. PubMed ID: 15035937 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Drug testing in Australian schools: policy implications and considerations of punitive, deterrence and/or prevention measures. Roche AM; Bywood P; Pidd K; Freeman T; Steenson T Int J Drug Policy; 2009 Nov; 20(6):521-8. PubMed ID: 19447026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Punitive versus public health oriented responses to drug use by pregnant women. Schroedel JR; Fiber P Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():217-35. PubMed ID: 12669331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Tourette's syndrome: a case example for mandatory genetic regulation of behavioral disorders. Yen RJ Law Psychol Rev; 2003; 27():29-54. PubMed ID: 15237537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What about my right to privacy? Where the Court went wrong in Ferguson v. City of Charleston. Barton EF Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):261-92. PubMed ID: 12645550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]