105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15035944)
1. Students as lab animals.
Roddey Holder A
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 15035944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Drug-testing research in high school students: is there a will or a way?
Koski G
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 15035941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Coercion, harm, and complicity in research integrated with mandatory public health programs.
Buchanan T
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 15035954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Coercion and the SATURN study.
Resnik DB
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 15035945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "What is legal is not necessarily ethical": the limits of law and drug-testing programs.
Luna E
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15035947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Spinning SATURN.
Eder J
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 15035955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandatory drug testing of high school athletes: unethical evaluation, unethical policy.
Louria D
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 15035943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjects.
Kopelman LM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15035950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Criticisms of SATURN mirror criticisms of any mandatory student drug-testing policy.
Verma AC
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 15035951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A clinician's perspective.
Gorton GE
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 15035949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Required "volunteers" for human investigations--just say no!
Cohen PJ
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 15035953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Orbiting SATURN: countering politically-charged misinformation with facts.
Chiodo GT; Moe EL; Goldberg L
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15035948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethics of research involving mandatory drug testing of high school athletes in Oregon.
Shamoo AE; Moreno JD
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15035935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A step toward truly protecting human subjects: reviewing the review boards.
Albrecht RR
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 15035952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandatory drug testing needs controlled evaluation.
Kosten TR
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):32. PubMed ID: 15035939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A response to commentators on "Ethics of research involving mandatory drug testing of high school athletes in Oregon".
Shamoo AE; Moreno JD
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):W29-30. PubMed ID: 15035937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there coercion or undue inducement to participate in health research in developing countries? An example from Rakai, Uganda.
Nalugoda F; Wagman J; Kiddugavu M; Kiwanuka N; Garrett E; Gray RH; Serwadda D; Wawer MJ; Emanuel EJ
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 19554819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Interviews that do not require review by IRBs.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2003 Dec; 18(12):3. PubMed ID: 15027430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Numerous violations of federal informed consent requirements.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 2004 Jan; 19(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 14997901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Avoiding a Jekyll-and-Hyde approach to the ethics of clinical research and practice.
Lemmens T; Miller PB
Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(2):14-7. PubMed ID: 12189062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
