411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15035952)
1. A step toward truly protecting human subjects: reviewing the review boards.
Albrecht RR
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 15035952
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Coercion and the SATURN study.
Resnik DB
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 15035945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Adolescents as doubly-vulnerable research subjects.
Kopelman LM
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 15035950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. "What is legal is not necessarily ethical": the limits of law and drug-testing programs.
Luna E
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 15035947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethics of research involving mandatory drug testing of high school athletes in Oregon.
Shamoo AE; Moreno JD
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 15035935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Orbiting SATURN: countering politically-charged misinformation with facts.
Chiodo GT; Moe EL; Goldberg L
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15035948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Coercion, harm, and complicity in research integrated with mandatory public health programs.
Buchanan T
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):57-9. PubMed ID: 15035954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Required "volunteers" for human investigations--just say no!
Cohen PJ
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):55-7. PubMed ID: 15035953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Criticisms of SATURN mirror criticisms of any mandatory student drug-testing policy.
Verma AC
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):52-3. PubMed ID: 15035951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Spinning SATURN.
Eder J
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 15035955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Drug-testing research in high school students: is there a will or a way?
Koski G
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 15035941
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A clinician's perspective.
Gorton GE
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):48-9. PubMed ID: 15035949
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Students as lab animals.
Roddey Holder A
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 15035944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A response to commentators on "Ethics of research involving mandatory drug testing of high school athletes in Oregon".
Shamoo AE; Moreno JD
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):W29-30. PubMed ID: 15035937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandatory drug testing of high school athletes: unethical evaluation, unethical policy.
Louria D
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 15035943
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandatory drug testing needs controlled evaluation.
Kosten TR
Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):32. PubMed ID: 15035939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Undue inducement: nonsense on stilts?
Emanuel EJ
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(5):9-13; discussion W8-11, W17. PubMed ID: 16179296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Considering behavioral and biomedical research on detainees in the mental health unit of an urban mega-jail.
Brakel SJ
N Engl J Crim Civ Confin; 1996; 22(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 11660427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Conducting empirical research on informed consent: challenges and questions.
Sachs GA; Hougham GW; Sugarman J; Agre P; Broome ME; Geller G; Kass N; Kodish E; Mintz J; Roberts LW; Sankar P; Siminoff LA; Sorenson J; Weiss A
IRB; 2003; Suppl 25(5):S4-S10. PubMed ID: 14870730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Rethinking research ethics.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):7-28. PubMed ID: 16036651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
