These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15036405)

  • 1. Rules of evidence for models on trial.
    Mueller LD; Rose MR
    Exp Gerontol; 2004 Mar; 39(3):451-2; author reply 453. PubMed ID: 15036405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relevance of multilevel statistical methods for identifying causal neighborhood effects.
    Subramanian SV
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 May; 58(10):1961-7. PubMed ID: 15020011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Causal inference and the relevance of social epidemiology.
    Oakes JM
    Soc Sci Med; 2004 May; 58(10):1969-71. PubMed ID: 15020012
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How much statistics do we need?
    Bacharova L
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jan; 40(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 16916520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Model mis-specification and overestimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Giraudeau B
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):957-64. PubMed ID: 15977300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regarding paper "Five interval estimators for proportion ratio under a stratified randomized clinical trial with noncompliance" by Lui K. J. and Chang K. C.
    Vach W
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):627-9; author reply 630-1. PubMed ID: 17722194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of futility in clinical trials.
    Snapinn S; Chen MG; Jiang Q; Koutsoukos T
    Pharm Stat; 2006; 5(4):273-81. PubMed ID: 17128426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dynamic comparison of Kaplan-Meier proportions: monitoring a randomized clinical trial with a long-term binary endpoint.
    Brittain E; Follmann D; Yang S
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):189-97. PubMed ID: 17680830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjusting for partially missing baseline measurements in randomized trials.
    White IR; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(7):993-1007. PubMed ID: 15570623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing homogeneity of two zero-inflated Poisson populations.
    Tse SK; Chow SC; Lu Q; Cosmatos D
    Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):159-70. PubMed ID: 19219907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discussion of "Identifiability and estimation of causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance and completely nonignorable missing data".
    Small DS; Cheng J
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):682-6; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 18759846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
    Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Laupacis A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):13-21.e5. PubMed ID: 18947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical issues arising in the Women's Health Initiative.
    Prentice RL; Pettinger M; Anderson GL
    Biometrics; 2005 Dec; 61(4):899-911; discussion 911-41. PubMed ID: 16401257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Controlled randomized clinical trials].
    Jaillon P
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2007; 191(4-5):739-56; discussion 756-8. PubMed ID: 18225427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Discussions.
    Vansteelandt S
    Biometrics; 2009 Sep; 65(3):686-9; discussion 689-91. PubMed ID: 18759845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multilevel analysis of group-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Kim HY; Preisser JS; Rozier RG; Valiyaparambil JV
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 34(4):241-51. PubMed ID: 16856945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. More on data monitoring and large apparent treatment effects.
    Anderson JR
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Jun; 26(3):416-7. PubMed ID: 15911475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Re: The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
    Shrier I
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2740-1; author reply 2741-2. PubMed ID: 18069729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the principal stratification approach to the Faenza randomized experiment on breast self-examination.
    Mattei A; Mealli F
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):437-46. PubMed ID: 17688496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.