These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15036698)

  • 1. Incorporating community objectives in improved wetland management: the use of the analytic hierarchy process.
    Herath G
    J Environ Manage; 2004 Mar; 70(3):263-73. PubMed ID: 15036698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stakeholder preferences towards conservation versus development for a wetland in Sri Lanka.
    Wattage P; Mardle S
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Oct; 77(2):122-32. PubMed ID: 15990218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Barmah-Millewa forest environmental water allocation.
    Stewart G; Harper B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):217-23. PubMed ID: 12171356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An introduction of co-management approach into Babon River management in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia.
    Susilowati I; Budiati L
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(7):173-80. PubMed ID: 14653648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Applying local knowledge: the contribution of oral history to wetland rehabilitation at Kanyapella Basin, Australia.
    Robertson HA; McGee TK
    J Environ Manage; 2003 Nov; 69(3):275-87. PubMed ID: 14580728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementing participatory decision making in forest planning.
    Ananda J
    Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 39(4):534-44. PubMed ID: 17318695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: the case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria.
    Sanon S; Hein T; Douven W; Winkler P
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 111():159-72. PubMed ID: 22892145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated wetland management: an analysis with group model building based on system dynamics model.
    Chen H; Chang YC; Chen KC
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Dec; 146():309-319. PubMed ID: 25194518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental flows and water quality objectives for the River Murray.
    Gippel C; Jacobs T; McLeod T
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):251-60. PubMed ID: 12171360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Local social capital and the acceptance of Protected Area policies: an empirical study of two Ramsar river delta ecosystems in northern Greece.
    Jones N; Clark JR; Panteli M; Proikaki M; Dimitrakopoulos PG
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Apr; 96(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 22208398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment.
    Ramanathan R
    J Environ Manage; 2001 Sep; 63(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 11591027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing for river health--integrating watercourse management, environmental water requirements and community participation.
    Scholz G; VanLaarhoven J; Phipps L; Favler L; Rixon S
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):209-13. PubMed ID: 12171354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Informing river management policies and programs with science.
    Edgar B; Schofield N; Campbell A
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(9):185-95. PubMed ID: 11419127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of wetland fragmentation due to damming on the linkages between water richness and ecosystem services.
    Kundu S; Pal S; Talukdar S; Mandal I
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Sep; 28(36):50266-50285. PubMed ID: 33959838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information preferences for the evaluation of coastal development impacts on ecosystem services: A multi-criteria assessment in the Australian context.
    Marre JB; Pascoe S; Thébaud O; Jennings S; Boncoeur J; Coglan L
    J Environ Manage; 2016 May; 173():141-50. PubMed ID: 26861223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Vulnerability assessment and management planning for the ecological environment in urban wetlands.
    Yang X; Liu S; Jia C; Liu Y; Yu C
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 298():113540. PubMed ID: 34399373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modelling the economic impact of environmental flows for regulated rivers in New South Wales, Australia.
    Jayasuriya RT
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(7):157-64. PubMed ID: 14653646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Workshop 1 (synthesis): multipurpose stream management strategies.
    Cederwall K
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(7):87-8. PubMed ID: 15195420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stakeholder preferences for payments for ecosystem services (PES) versus other environmental management approaches for mangrove forests.
    Thompson BS; Friess DA
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Mar; 233():636-648. PubMed ID: 30599416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying science to conservation and restoration of the world's wetlands.
    Mitsch WJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(8):13-26. PubMed ID: 16007923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.