These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

264 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15037392)

  • 1. Damaged babies from assisted reproductive technologies: focus on the BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) outcome.
    Healy D;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 Mar; 81(3):512-3, discussion 526. PubMed ID: 15037392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Managing the complications associated with assisted reproductive technologies.
    Patchava S; Gelbaya TA; Nardo LG
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 19745799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is there increased monozygotic twinning after assisted reproductive technology?
    Toledo MG
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Oct; 45(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 16171467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis of 1540 neonates with birth defects related to different assisted reproductive technique].
    Wang F; Sun YP; Kong HJ; Su YC; Guo YH; Liang JY; Li PF
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Feb; 44(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 19570420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Obstetric outcomes and congenital abnormalities after in vitro maturation, in vitro fertilization, and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Buckett WM; Chian RC; Holzer H; Dean N; Usher R; Tan SL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Oct; 110(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 17906024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Outcomes of singleton births after blastocyst versus nonblastocyst transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
    Fernando D; Halliday JL; Breheny S; Healy DL
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Mar; 97(3):579-84. PubMed ID: 22281036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Birth defects after assisted reproductive technologies in China: analysis of 15,405 offspring in seven centers (2004 to 2008).
    Yan J; Huang G; Sun Y; Zhao X; Chen S; Zou S; Hao C; Quan S; Chen ZJ
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jan; 95(1):458-60. PubMed ID: 20850722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The singleton, term gestation, and live birth rate per cycle initiated: a 1-year experience in in vitro fertilization cycles with native and donated oocytes.
    Bellver J; Albert C; Soares SR; Alvarez C; Pellicer A
    Fertil Steril; 2005 May; 83(5):1404-9. PubMed ID: 15866576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Is BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) truly the best?
    Griesinger G; Dafopoulos K; Schultze-Mosgau A; Felberbaum R; Diedrich K
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1239-41. PubMed ID: 15105385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. World collaborative report on Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2002.
    ; de Mouzon J; Lancaster P; Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; Adamson D
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Sep; 24(9):2310-20. PubMed ID: 19474459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IVF/ICSI twin pregnancies: risks and prevention.
    Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod Update; 2005; 11(6):575-93. PubMed ID: 16123055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Assessing the BESST index for reproduction treatment.
    Davies MJ; Wang JX; Norman RJ
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1049-51. PubMed ID: 15044408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perinatal outcome of singleton siblings born after assisted reproductive technology and spontaneous conception: Danish national sibling-cohort study.
    Henningsen AK; Pinborg A; Lidegaard Ø; Vestergaard C; Forman JL; Andersen AN
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Mar; 95(3):959-63. PubMed ID: 20813359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increased risk of placenta previa in pregnancies following IVF/ICSI; a comparison of ART and non-ART pregnancies in the same mother.
    Romundstad LB; Romundstad PR; Sunde A; von Düring V; Skjaerven R; Vatten LJ
    Hum Reprod; 2006 Sep; 21(9):2353-8. PubMed ID: 16728419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Singleton live births should also include preterm births.
    Wennerholm UB; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1943-5. PubMed ID: 15243003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assisted hatching.
    Sallam HN
    Minerva Ginecol; 2004 Jun; 56(3):223-34. PubMed ID: 15258534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors affecting low birthweight after assisted reproduction technology: difference between transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos suggests an adverse effect of oocyte collection.
    Shih W; Rushford DD; Bourne H; Garrett C; McBain JC; Healy DL; Baker HW
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1644-53. PubMed ID: 18442997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The public health implications of assisted reproductive technologies.
    Deonandan R
    Chronic Dis Can; 2010 Sep; 30(4):119-24. PubMed ID: 20946712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.