These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15038136)

  • 1. Time for a change of agenda.
    Cole A
    Nurs Times; 2004 Mar 2-8; 100(9):45. PubMed ID: 15038136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefits of Agenda for Change (AFC).
    Plummer A
    RCM Midwives; 2005 Oct; 8(10):426; discussion 426. PubMed ID: 16250164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More losers than winners from Agenda for Change.
    Parish C
    Nurs Stand; 2005 Oct 26-Nov 1; 20(7):14-5. PubMed ID: 16281533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A raw deal? Nursing salaries.
    Sisson T
    Nurs Times; 1982 Mar 10-16; 78(10):396. PubMed ID: 6917168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nurses' pay: what the government said.
    Gaze H
    Nurs Times; 1988 Feb 10-16; 84(6):20. PubMed ID: 3353252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heard but rarely heeded.
    Turner T
    Nurs Times; 1990 Feb 14-20; 86(7):19. PubMed ID: 2315136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Agenda for short change?
    Payne S
    Community Pract; 2006 Dec; 79(12):413. PubMed ID: 17260435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pay review body evidence 2006.
    Adkins C
    Community Pract; 2006 Dec; 79(12):410-1. PubMed ID: 17256287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasons for rocking the boat.
    Bolger T; Fogg D
    Nurs Times; 1979 Jul; 75(26):1122-3. PubMed ID: 257416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Playing the waiting game.
    Campbell C
    Nurs Mirror; 1985 Apr; 160(14):3. PubMed ID: 3845571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Local pay rip?
    Kenny C
    Nurs Times; 1997 Feb 12-18; 93(7):12-3. PubMed ID: 9095938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recruitment and retention: vital evidence in the pay debate.
    Lampada; 1988 Jan; (13):4. PubMed ID: 3357360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing grade expectations.
    Gray J
    Nurs Stand; 1989 Nov 8-14; 4(7):23. PubMed ID: 2513507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. We must change too.
    Galbraith A
    Nurs Stand; 1996 Feb; 10(23):16. PubMed ID: 8695457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Who needs merit money?
    Gaze H
    Nurs Times; 1988 Feb 24-Mar 1; 84(8):18. PubMed ID: 3353279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pay and conditions: the state of the nursing nation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1992 Oct 21-27; 7(5):18. PubMed ID: 1450020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No one's a winner.
    Gulland A
    Nurs Times; 1998 Feb 11-17; 94(6):14-5. PubMed ID: 9528561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pay: reviewing the situation.
    Hand D
    Nurs Stand; 1991 Nov 27-Dec 3; 6(10):18-9. PubMed ID: 1764394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Every silver lining has a cloud.
    Naughtie J
    Nurs Times; 1988 May 4-10; 84(18):24-5. PubMed ID: 3380707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. All a misunderstanding. Interview by Dina Leifer.
    Jarrold K
    Nurs Stand; 1995 May 3-9; 9(32):14. PubMed ID: 7786729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.