These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15039159)
21. Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. Macari M; Milano A; Lavelle M; Berman P; Megibow AJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jun; 174(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 10845478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of polyp distance on CT colonography between supine and prone scans using an automated path-distance measurement tool: correlation with colonoscopy. Park HS; Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JY; Kim SG; Han JK; Choi BI Abdom Imaging; 2010 Feb; 35(1):41-8. PubMed ID: 19089490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. CT colonography using 16-MDCT in the evaluation of colorectal cancer. Chung DJ; Huh KC; Choi WJ; Kim JK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jan; 184(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 15615957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Detection of flat lesions in the colon with CT colonography. Fidler JL; Johnson CD; MacCarty RL; Welch TJ; Hara AK; Harmsen WS Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 12173360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Missed lesions at primary 2D CT colonography: further support for 3D polyp detection. Pickhardt PJ Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):648; author reply 648-9. PubMed ID: 18227561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy. Cohnen M; Vogt C; Beck A; Andersen K; Heinen W; vom Dahl S; Aurich V; Haeussinger D; Moedder U AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Nov; 183(5):1355-9. PubMed ID: 15505303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. CT colonography with limited bowel preparation: performance characteristics in an increased-risk population. Jensch S; de Vries AH; Peringa J; Bipat S; Dekker E; Baak LC; Bartelsman JF; Heutinck A; Montauban van Swijndregt AD; Stoker J Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):122-32. PubMed ID: 18292475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Macari M; Bini EJ; Xue X; Milano A; Katz SS; Resnick D; Chandarana H; Krinsky G; Klingenbeck K; Marshall CH; Megibow AJ Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):383-92. PubMed ID: 12147833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement. Burling D; Halligan S; Taylor S; Brennand DJ; Altman DG; Bassett P; Atkin W; Bartram CI AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1597-604. PubMed ID: 16714648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Deformable registration of supine and prone colons for computed tomographic colonography. Suh JW; Wyatt CL J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):902-11. PubMed ID: 19940658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography. Macari M; Bini EJ; Jacobs SL; Lui YW; Laks S; Milano A; Babb J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jul; 183(1):127-34. PubMed ID: 15208126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Polyp characteristics correctly annotated by computer-aided detection software but ignored by reporting radiologists during CT colonography. Taylor SA; Robinson C; Boone D; Honeyfield L; Halligan S Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 19789221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens. Park SH; Choi EK; Lee SS; Byeon JS; Jo JY; Kim YH; Lee KH; Ha HK; Han JK Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):157-64. PubMed ID: 17507724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison. Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative performance of two polyp detection systems on CT colonography. Fletcher JG; Booya F; Summers RM; Roy D; Guendel L; Schmidt B; McCollough CH; Fidler JL AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Aug; 189(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 17646451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. Yoshida H; Näppi J; MacEneaney P; Rubin DT; Dachman AH Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):963-79. PubMed ID: 12110726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Region-based supine-prone correspondence for the reduction of false-positive CAD polyp candidates in CT colonography. Näppi J; Okamura A; Frimmel H; Dachman A; Yoshida H Acad Radiol; 2005 Jun; 12(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 15935968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]