BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15040376)

  • 1. Genetics and patients' rights: where are the limits?
    Laurie GT
    Med Law Int; 2000; 5(1):25-44. PubMed ID: 15040376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genetic secrets and the family.
    Bell D; Bennett B
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(2):130-61. PubMed ID: 12778930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Privacy and disclosure in medical genetics examined in an ethics of care.
    Wertz DC; Fletcher JC
    Bioethics; 1991 Jul; 5(3):212-32. PubMed ID: 11659340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The most personal information of all: an appraisal of genetic privacy in the shadow of the Human Genome Project.
    Laurie GT
    Int J Law Policy Family; 1996; 10(1):74-101. PubMed ID: 16883663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical and juridical issues of genetic testing: a review of the international regulation.
    Nicolás P
    Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 19036602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MSJAMA. The dilemma of confidentiality in Huntington disease.
    Wusthoff C
    JAMA; 2003 Sep; 290(9):1219-20. PubMed ID: 12953009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Human Genome Project: a challenge to the human rights framework.
    Iles AT
    Harv Hum Rights J; 1996; 9():27-60. PubMed ID: 11660498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patients' rights or family responsibilities? Two approaches to genetic testing.
    Skene L
    Med Law Rev; 1998; 6(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 11657222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Information(al) matters: bioethics and the boundaries of the public and the private.
    Parker LS
    Soc Philos Policy; 2002; 19(2):83-112. PubMed ID: 12678083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An interest in human dignity as the basis for genomic torts.
    Brownsword R
    Washburn Law J; 2003; 42(3):413-81. PubMed ID: 15112710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Autonomy, respect, and genetic information policy: a reply to Tuija Takala and Matti Häyry.
    Rhodes R
    J Med Philos; 2000 Feb; 25(1):114-20. PubMed ID: 11645210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rethinking medical confidentiality: the impact of genetics.
    Wachbroit R
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1993; 27(4):1391-410. PubMed ID: 11657043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Property rights in genetic information.
    Spinello RA
    Ethics Inf Technol; 2004; 6(1):29-42. PubMed ID: 16969959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Where in the world are we going with the new genetics?
    Fletcher JC
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1989; 5():33-51. PubMed ID: 11645622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genetic privacy: orthodoxy or oxymoron?
    Sommerville A; English V
    J Med Ethics; 1999 Apr; 25(2):144-50. PubMed ID: 10226920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Privacy of genetic information.
    Setoyama K
    Osaka Univ Law Rev; 2005 Feb; 52():75-105. PubMed ID: 16482694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic secrets and the family: a response to Bell and Bennett.
    Skene L
    Med Law Rev; 2001; 9(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 12778931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic testing and insurance: an international comparison.
    Simon J
    J Int Bioethique; 2003; 14(3-4):59-78. PubMed ID: 15281200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Autonomy, informed consent, and genetic testing: an uneasy tension.
    Hamilton R; Bowers B
    J Nurs Law; 2003 May; 9(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 15282895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic privacy: the potential for genetic discrimination in insurance.
    Jensen P
    Law Rev; 1999 Apr; 29(2):347-69. PubMed ID: 12741371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.