306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15040376)
21. The genetic revolution and the physician's duty of confidentiality. The role of the old Hippocratic virtues in the regulation of the new genetic intimacy.
Berry RM
J Leg Med; 1997 Dec; 18(4):401-41. PubMed ID: 9433035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Guthrie cards: legal and ethical issues.
Elkin K; Jones DG
N Z Bioeth J; 2000 Oct; 1(2):22-6. PubMed ID: 15586976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Publication-related risks to privacy: ethical implications of pedigree studies.
Powers M
IRB; 1993; 15(4):7-11. PubMed ID: 11652150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Who's the parent here? The family's impact on the autonomy of older persons.
Kapp MB
Emory Law J; 1992; 41(3):773-803. PubMed ID: 11657641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Genetic testing of children for familial cancers: a comparative legal perspective on consent, communication of information and confidentiality.
Gilbar R
Fam Cancer; 2010 Mar; 9(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 19609725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genetic testing without consent: the implications of the new Human Tissue Act 2004.
Lucassen A; Kaye J
J Med Ethics; 2006 Dec; 32(12):690-2. PubMed ID: 17145906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Testing the limits of the 'joint account' model of genetic information: a legal thought experiment.
Foster C; Herring J; Boyd M
J Med Ethics; 2015 May; 41(5):379-82. PubMed ID: 24965717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genetic testing in the workplace: employer dream, employee nightmare -- legislative regulation in the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany.
Deyerle KA
Comp Labor Law J; 1997; 18(4):547-99. PubMed ID: 11657448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Women's rights and reproductive health care in a global perspective.
Hellsten SK
J Soc Philos; 2000; 31(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 15069944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Moral equity or cultural integrity: a dilemma for genetic counseling.
Moreno JD
Semin Perinatol; 1987 Jul; 11(3):229-31. PubMed ID: 3616653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. MSJAMA. Between a rock and a hard place.
Garrison A
JAMA; 2003 Sep; 290(9):1217-8. PubMed ID: 12953008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Public health genetics. Fundamental rights aspects].
Pestalozza C
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2009 Jul; 52(7):683-8. PubMed ID: 19533044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Ethics, law, and medical genetics: after the human genome is mapped.
Fletcher JC; Wertz DC
Emory Law J; 1990; 39(3):747-809. PubMed ID: 11653908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. MSJAMA. Genetic information and competing interests.
Ihler E
JAMA; 2003 Sep; 290(9):1216. PubMed ID: 12953007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The Double Helix: Applying an Ethic of Care to the Duty to Warn Genetic Relatives of Genetic Information.
Weaver M
Bioethics; 2016 Mar; 30(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 26194147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Genetic privacy in Washington state: policy considerations and a Model Genetic Privacy Act.
Jensen KA
Seattle Univ Law Rev; 1997; 21(2):357-86. PubMed ID: 11660670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Preliminary draft of a Universal Declaration on the Human Genome and Human Rights.
Unesco. International Bioethics Committee
Politics Life Sci; 1996 Sep; 15(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 11654812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Introduction: why protect the human genome?
Sass HM
J Med Philos; 1998 Jun; 23(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 9736185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Human need and the right of patients to privacy.
Doyal L
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1997; 14(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 9458607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cultural considerations in release of information.
Meer D; VandeCreek L
Ethics Behav; 2002; 12(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 12956137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
