These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15041864)

  • 1. [Predictability of maxillary distraction with the trans-sinusoidal distractor].
    Nadjmi N
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2004 Feb; 105(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 15041864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trans-sinusal maxillary distraction for correction of midfacial hypoplasia: long-term clinical results.
    Nadjmi N; Schutyser F; Van Erum R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 35(10):885-96. PubMed ID: 16965902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new Le Fort I internal distraction device in the treatment of severe maxillary hypoplasia.
    Gateno J; Engel ER; Teichgraeber JF; Yamaji KE; Xia JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 63(1):148-54. PubMed ID: 15635571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New internal Le Fort I distractor for the treatment of midface hypoplasia.
    Yamaji KE; Gateno J; Xia JJ; Teichgraeber JF
    J Craniofac Surg; 2004 Jan; 15(1):124-7. PubMed ID: 14704578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maxillary distraction using a trans-sinusal distractor: technical note.
    Nadjmi V; Van Erum R; Schoenaers J; Schepers E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Oct; 32(5):553-9. PubMed ID: 14759118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillofacial intraoral distraction osteogenesis followed by elastic traction in cleft maxillary deformity.
    Lauwers F; Mayorca-Guiliani A; Lopez R; Woisard-Bassols V; Paoli JR; Boutault F
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Jan; 34(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 15617973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Trans-sinusoidal maxillary distraction in three cleft patients.
    Wenghoefer M; Martini M; Nadjmi N; Schutyser F; Jagtman AK; Bergé S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 35(10):954-60. PubMed ID: 17014993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Dual segmental distraction osteogenesis of the midface in a patient with Apert syndrome.
    Takashima M; Kitai N; Murakami S; Takagi S; Hosokawa K; Kreiborg S; Takada K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2006 Jul; 43(4):499-506. PubMed ID: 16854210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical controversies in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Part two. External versus internal distraction osteogenesis for the management of severe maxillary hypoplasia: external distraction.
    Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2598-604. PubMed ID: 19022141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of internal maxillary distraction for maxillary hypoplasia: a preliminary report.
    Van Sickels JE; Madsen MJ; Cunningham LL; Bird D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 64(12):1715-20. PubMed ID: 17113436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term results of distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla and midface.
    Wiltfang J; Hirschfelder U; Neukam FW; Kessler P
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Dec; 40(6):473-9. PubMed ID: 12464203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rigid External Distractor Aided Conventional Le Fort III Osteotomy Advancement in Adult With Severe Midfacial Hypoplasia.
    Wang R; Liu C
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 27(1):e59-62. PubMed ID: 26703038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [An adjustable distractor for transverse maxillary distraction osteogenesis].
    Leyder P; Wycisk G; Quilichini J
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale; 2013 Jun; 114(3):170-4. PubMed ID: 23827271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis with rigid external distraction.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11905329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Soft tissue profile changes after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year follow-up.
    Wen-Ching Ko E; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Sep; 58(9):959-69; discussion 969-70. PubMed ID: 10981975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal maxillary distraction with a new bimalar device.
    Kahn DM; Broujerdi J; Schendel SA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 66(4):675-83. PubMed ID: 18355590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Le Fort III osteotomy: a new internal positioned distractor.
    Riediger D; Poukens JM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Aug; 61(8):882-9. PubMed ID: 12905438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New fixation method for maxillary distraction osteogenesis using locking attachments.
    Suzuki EY; Buranastidporn B; Ishii M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1553-60. PubMed ID: 16982316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transantral distraction devices in correction of severe maxillary deformity in cleft patients.
    Shokirov S; Wangerin K
    Stomatologija; 2011; 13(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 21558788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons.
    He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.