221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15042009)
1. Preinduction cervical ripening with the Foley catheter and the risk of subsequent preterm birth.
Sciscione A; Larkin M; O'Shea A; Pollock M; Hoffman M; Colmorgen G
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Mar; 190(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 15042009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening.
Dalui R; Suri V; Ray P; Gupta I
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Apr; 84(4):362-7. PubMed ID: 15762966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without extraamniotic saline infusion for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Lin MG; Reid KJ; Treaster MR; Nuthalapaty FS; Ramsey PS; Lu GC
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 110(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 17766600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Labor induction in women with an unfavorable Bishop score: randomized controlled trial of intrauterine Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin infusion versus Foley catheter with extra-amniotic saline infusion with concurrent oxytocin infusion.
Guinn DA; Davies JK; Jones RO; Sullivan L; Wolf D
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):225-9. PubMed ID: 15295370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
Rust OA; Greybush M; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Balducci J
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Preinduction cervical ripening techniques compared.
Greybush M; Singleton C; Atlas RO; Balducci J; Rust OA
J Reprod Med; 2001 Jan; 46(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 11209625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Unsucessful labour induction in women with unfavourable cervical scores: predictors and management.
Caliskan E; Dilbaz S; Gelisen O; Dilbaz B; Ozturk N; Haberal A
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Dec; 44(6):562-7. PubMed ID: 15598298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 at preterm.
Melamed N; Yogev Y; Hadar E; Hod M; Ben-Haroush A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 18158629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
Pettker CM; Pocock SB; Smok DP; Lee SM; Devine PC
Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 111(6):1320-6. PubMed ID: 18515515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical ripening with transcervical foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture.
Bujold E; Blackwell SC; Gauthier RJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jan; 103(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 14704239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial comparing a 30-mL and an 80-mL Foley catheter balloon for preinduction cervical ripening.
Levy R; Kanengiser B; Furman B; Ben Arie A; Brown D; Hagay ZJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1632-6. PubMed ID: 15547534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-induction cervical ripening: transcervical foley catheter versus intravaginal misoprostol.
Adeniji OA; Oladokun A; Olayemi O; Adeniji OI; Odukogbe AA; Ogunbode O; Aimakhu CO; Omigbodun AO; Ilesanmi AO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Feb; 25(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 15814391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Randomized trial of preinduction cervical ripening: misoprostol vs oxytocin.
Fonseca L; Wood HC; Lucas MJ; Ramin SM; Phatak D; Gilstrap LC; Yeomans ER
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Sep; 199(3):305.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18771993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of vaginal birth in nulliparas undergoing preinduction cervical ripening.
Sciscione A; Hoffman MK; DeLuca S; O'Shea A; Benson J; Pollock M; Vakili B
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 106(5 Pt 1):980-5. PubMed ID: 16260515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Randomised trial of intravaginal misoprostol and intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Owolabi AT; Kuti O; Ogunlola IO
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Aug; 25(6):565-8. PubMed ID: 16234141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Increased risk of cervical canal infections with intracervical Foley catheter.
Siddiqui S; Zuberi NF; Zafar A; Qureshi RN
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Mar; 13(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 12689532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cervical dilatation on presentation for preterm labor and subsequent preterm birth.
How HY; Khoury JC; Sibai BM
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 19021099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
Vahratian A; Zhang J; Troendle JF; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
