These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15043178)

  • 1. A Native American community with a 7% cesarean delivery rate: does case mix, ethnicity, or labor management explain the low rate?
    Leeman L; Leeman R
    Ann Fam Med; 2003; 1(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 15043178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cesarean delivery in Native American women: are low rates explained by practices common to the Indian health service?
    Mahoney SF; Malcoe LH
    Birth; 2005 Sep; 32(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 16128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do all hospitals need cesarean delivery capability? An outcomes study of maternity care in a rural hospital without on-site cesarean capability.
    Leeman L; Leeman R
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Feb; 51(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11978210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospital variation in utilization and success of trial of labor after a prior cesarean.
    Xu X; Lee HC; Lin H; Lundsberg LS; Campbell KH; Lipkind HS; Pettker CM; Illuzzi JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jan; 220(1):98.e1-98.e14. PubMed ID: 30278176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors predicting cesarean delivery for American Indian women in New Mexico.
    Schiff M; Rogers C
    Birth; 1999 Dec; 26(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 10655827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effect of induced labor on delivery outcome of pregnant women undergoing vaginal trial of labor after cesarean section].
    Cao YL; Zou LY; Zhang WY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Sep; 54(9):582-587. PubMed ID: 31550773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
    Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of labor induction on cesarean section rates in diabetic pregnancies.
    Levy AL; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; Curet LB; Rayburn WF
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Nov; 47(11):931-2. PubMed ID: 12497683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction in the Cesarean Delivery Rate After Obstetric Care Consensus Guideline Implementation.
    Wilson-Leedy JG; DiSilvestro AJ; Repke JT; Pauli JM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jul; 128(1):145-152. PubMed ID: 27275806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in triplet gestations.
    Lappen JR; Hackney DN; Bailit JL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):493.e1-6. PubMed ID: 27166014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [In case of fetal macrosomia, the best strategy is the induction of labor at 38 weeks of gestation].
    Rozenberg P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Nov; 45(9):1037-1044. PubMed ID: 27771202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery if labor is induced?
    Kim LH; Cheng YW; Delaney S; Jelin AC; Caughey AB
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2010 May; 23(5):383-8. PubMed ID: 19951010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
    Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical dilation at the time of cesarean section for dystocia -- effect on subsequent trial of labor.
    Abildgaard H; Ingerslev MD; Nickelsen C; Secher NJ
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Feb; 92(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 23025257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean in the preterm period.
    Mardy AH; Ananth CV; Grobman WA; Gyamfi-Bannerman C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):513.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27262971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term.
    Aghideh FK; Mullin PM; Ingles S; Ouzounian JG; Opper N; Wilson ML; Miller DA; Lee RH
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Apr; 27(6):592-6. PubMed ID: 23919802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonmedically indicated induction in morbidly obese women is not associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery.
    Kawakita T; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Reddy UM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 28578171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalopathy, and intrauterine fetal demise.
    Hankins GD; Clark SM; Munn MB
    Semin Perinatol; 2006 Oct; 30(5):276-87. PubMed ID: 17011400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Zipori Y; Grunwald O; Ginsberg Y; Beloosesky R; Weiner Z
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):191.e1-191.e7. PubMed ID: 30616966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intravenous fluid rate for reduction of cesarean delivery rate in nulliparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Ehsanipoor RM; Saccone G; Seligman NS; Pierce-Williams RAM; Ciardulli A; Berghella V
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Jul; 96(7):804-811. PubMed ID: 28236651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.