These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15043833)

  • 1. Genome size: does bigger mean worse?
    Charlesworth B; Barton N
    Curr Biol; 2004 Mar; 14(6):R233-5. PubMed ID: 15043833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evolution of drift robustness in small populations.
    LaBar T; Adami C
    Nat Commun; 2017 Oct; 8(1):1012. PubMed ID: 29044114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The first steps of transposable elements invasion: parasitic strategy vs. genetic drift.
    Le Rouzic A; Capy P
    Genetics; 2005 Feb; 169(2):1033-43. PubMed ID: 15731520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dynamics of transposable elements in structured populations.
    Deceliere G; Charles S; Biémont C
    Genetics; 2005 Jan; 169(1):467-74. PubMed ID: 15466430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence for genetic drift in the diversification of a geographically isolated population of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrococcus.
    Escobar-Páramo P; Ghosh S; DiRuggiero J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2297-303. PubMed ID: 16079249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Note on the computation of critical effective population sizes.
    Zhang L; Watson LT
    J Comput Biol; 2007 Sep; 14(7):950-60. PubMed ID: 17803372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term evolution of transposable elements.
    Le Rouzic A; Boutin TS; Capy P
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Dec; 104(49):19375-80. PubMed ID: 18040048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The origins of genome complexity.
    Lynch M; Conery JS
    Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5649):1401-4. PubMed ID: 14631042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of plant genomes: scaling up from a population perspective.
    Flowers JM; Purugganan MD
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2008 Dec; 18(6):565-70. PubMed ID: 19131240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multivariate analysis of genomic variables, effective population size, and mutation rate.
    Bhattachan P; Dong B
    BMC Res Notes; 2019 Jan; 12(1):60. PubMed ID: 30683153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A role for nonadaptive processes in plant genome size evolution?
    Whitney KD; Baack EJ; Hamrick JL; Godt MJ; Barringer BC; Bennett MD; Eckert CG; Goodwillie C; Kalisz S; Leitch IJ; Ross-Ibarra J
    Evolution; 2010 Jul; 64(7):2097-109. PubMed ID: 20148953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Recent progress in plant genome size evolution].
    Chen JJ; Wang Y
    Yi Chuan; 2009 May; 31(5):464-70. PubMed ID: 19586839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Why Selection Might Be Stronger When Populations Are Small: Intron Size and Density Predict within and between-Species Usage of Exonic Splice Associated cis-Motifs.
    Wu X; Hurst LD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Jul; 32(7):1847-61. PubMed ID: 25771198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Different Evolutionary Paths to Complexity for Small and Large Populations of Digital Organisms.
    LaBar T; Adami C
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Dec; 12(12):e1005066. PubMed ID: 27923053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causes of insertion sequences abundance in prokaryotic genomes.
    Touchon M; Rocha EP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Apr; 24(4):969-81. PubMed ID: 17251179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Models of the population genetics of transposable elements.
    Le Rouzic A; Deceliere G
    Genet Res; 2005 Jun; 85(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 16174335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Budding yeast as a model organism for population genetics.
    Zeyl C
    Yeast; 2000 Jun; 16(8):773-84. PubMed ID: 10861902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid evolutionary escape by large populations from local fitness peaks is likely in nature.
    Weinreich DM; Chao L
    Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1175-82. PubMed ID: 16050095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The consequences of genetic drift for bacterial genome complexity.
    Kuo CH; Moran NA; Ochman H
    Genome Res; 2009 Aug; 19(8):1450-4. PubMed ID: 19502381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection in favor of nucleotides G and C diversifies evolution rates and levels of polymorphism at mammalian synonymous sites.
    Kondrashov FA; Ogurtsov AY; Kondrashov AS
    J Theor Biol; 2006 Jun; 240(4):616-26. PubMed ID: 16343547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.