These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15044405)

  • 1. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Is there a single 'parameter of excellence'?
    Pinborg A; Loft A; Ziebe S; Nyboe Andersen A
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1052-4. PubMed ID: 15044405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Defining outcome in ART: a Gordian knot of safety, efficacy and quality.
    Land JA; Evers JL
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1046-8. PubMed ID: 15016768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Assessing the BESST index for reproduction treatment.
    Davies MJ; Wang JX; Norman RJ
    Hum Reprod; 2004 May; 19(5):1049-51. PubMed ID: 15044408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: no single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin births and singleton births should be counted as successes.
    Dickey RP; Sartor BM; Pyrzak R
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):783-7. PubMed ID: 15016781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten.
    Tiitinen A; Hydén-Granskog C; Gissler M
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2439-41. PubMed ID: 15319392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Is BESST (birth emphasizing a successful singleton at term) truly the best?
    Griesinger G; Dafopoulos K; Schultze-Mosgau A; Felberbaum R; Diedrich K
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Jun; 19(6):1239-41. PubMed ID: 15105385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1207-20. PubMed ID: 15136079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: challenges in measuring and reporting success rates for assisted reproductive technology treatments: what is optimal?
    Schieve LA; Reynolds MA
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Apr; 19(4):778-82. PubMed ID: 15033946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The cumulated singleton/twin delivery rates per oocyte pick-up: the CUSIDERA and CUTWIDERA.
    Germond M; Urner F; Chanson A; Primi MP; Wirthner D; Senn A
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Nov; 19(11):2442-4. PubMed ID: 15358719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Register data on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in Europe including a detailed description of ART in Denmark.
    Nyboe Andersen A; Erb K
    Int J Androl; 2006 Feb; 29(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 16466519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.
    ;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1356-64. PubMed ID: 17070192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.
    Schmidt L
    Dan Med Bull; 2006 Nov; 53(4):390-417. PubMed ID: 17150146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Should BESST really be the primary endpoint for assisted reproduction?
    Messinis IE; Domali E
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1933-5. PubMed ID: 15192073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The next step to improving outcomes of IVF: consider the whole treatment.
    Heijnen EM; Macklon NS; Fauser BC
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1936-8. PubMed ID: 15217998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Redefining success in the context of elective single embryo transfer: evidence, intuition and financial reality.
    Bhattacharya S; Templeton A
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1939-42. PubMed ID: 15217994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? Singleton live births should also include preterm births.
    Wennerholm UB; Bergh C
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1943-5. PubMed ID: 15243003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
    Andersen AN; Goossens V; Ferraretti AP; Bhattacharya S; Felberbaum R; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; ;
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Apr; 23(4):756-71. PubMed ID: 18281243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prenatal testing among women pregnant after assisted reproductive techniques in Denmark 1995-2000: a national cohort study.
    Gjerris AC; Loft A; Pinborg A; Christiansen M; Tabor A
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Jul; 23(7):1545-52. PubMed ID: 18385126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.