194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15044785)
1. Biomedical research publication system.
Wang YL; Burridge K; Dembo M; Gabbiani G; Hanks SK; Hosoya H; Janmey P; Karlsson R; Lindberg U; Mabuchi I; Otey C; Rottner K; Small JV; Wang CL; Zigmond S
Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5666):1974-6. PubMed ID: 15044785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. E-publication proposal.
Baum H
Science; 1999 Aug; 285(5430):1014. PubMed ID: 10475841
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. E-publication proposal.
Marchesi V
Science; 1999 Aug; 285(5430):1013-4. PubMed ID: 10475840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Dangers of over-dependence on peer-reviewed publication.
Nature; 1999 Oct; 401(6755):727. PubMed ID: 10548083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Changing scientific publishing.
Raff MC; Stevens CF; Roberts K; Shatz CJ; Roberts K; Shatz CJ; Newsome WT
Science; 2004 Aug; 305(5686):945-6. PubMed ID: 15310878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peer-review and publication of research protocols and proposals: a role for open access journals.
Eysenbach G
J Med Internet Res; 2004 Sep; 6(3):e37. PubMed ID: 15471763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Keeping peer-reviewed publication relevant in the internet age.
Randleman JB
J Refract Surg; 2012 Jul; 28(7):447-8. PubMed ID: 22767161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Internet and scientific publishing.
van Mil F
Pharm World Sci; 2003 Dec; 25(6):243. PubMed ID: 14689809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Electronic publication of biomedical research.
Vidyashankar C; Sachdev HP
Indian Pediatr; 2000 May; 37(5):477-9. PubMed ID: 10820539
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The crisis in scholarly publishing: open access to the rescue?
Oren GA
J Neuroophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18347450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. PLoS stays afloat with bulk publishing.
Butler D
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7200):11. PubMed ID: 18596768
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "E-biomed" and clinical research.
Bell C; Ruskin K
N Engl J Med; 1999 Sep; 341(14):1080-1; author reply 1081. PubMed ID: 10507926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer review, unmasked.
Gura T
Nature; 2002 Mar; 416(6878):258-60. PubMed ID: 11907547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Peer review warts and all.
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2004 Aug; 11(8):679. PubMed ID: 15280874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The youth team.
Chen J
Nature; 2001 May; 411(6833):13-4. PubMed ID: 11333946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Double check casts doubt on statistics in published papers.
Pearson H
Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6991):490. PubMed ID: 15175712
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Open Access initiative in scientific and biomedical publishing: fourth in the series on editorship.
Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP; Albert DM
Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 Jan; 139(1):156-67. PubMed ID: 15652842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why are people reluctant to join in open review?
Liu SV
Nature; 2007 Jun; 447(7148):1052. PubMed ID: 17597736
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A challenge for scientific medical journals: quest for the holy p-pub/e-pub balance.
Wagner GS
J Electrocardiol; 2006 Apr; 39(2):133-4. PubMed ID: 16580406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Making sure corrections don't vanish online.
Shim EH; Parekh V
Nature; 2005 Mar; 434(7029):18; discussion 18. PubMed ID: 15744271
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
