BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15045522)

  • 1. Enhancing area surrounding breast carcinoma on MR mammography: comparison with pathological examination.
    Van Goethem M; Schelfout K; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Tjalma WA; Weyler J; De Schepper A
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1363-70. PubMed ID: 15045522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component.
    Van Goethem M; Schelfout K; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; Tjalma WA; De Schepper A; Weyler J; Parizel PM
    Eur J Radiol; 2007 May; 62(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 17223002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI?
    Zuiani C; Francescutti GE; Londero V; Zunnui I; Bazzocchi M
    J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Sep; 21(3 Suppl):89-95. PubMed ID: 12585661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of MRI features of different grades of DCIS and invasive carcinoma of the breast.
    Van Goethem M; Schelfout K; Kersschot E; Colpaert C; Weyler J; Verslegers I; Biltjes I; De Schepper A; Parizel PM
    JBR-BTR; 2005; 88(5):225-32. PubMed ID: 16302331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of breast MRI for surgical decision in patients with breast cancer: ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal carcinoma.
    Lee J; Jung JH; Kim WW; Park CS; Lee RK; Kim HJ; Kim WH; Park HY
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):934. PubMed ID: 32993586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-phase dynamic breast magnetic resonance imaging with two-way subtraction.
    Choi N; Han BK; Choe YH; Kim HS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2005; 29(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 16272861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Magnetic resonance mammography in small vs. advanced breast lesions - systematic comparison reveals significant impact of lesion size on diagnostic accuracy in 936 histologically verified breast lesions.
    Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Vag T; Gröschel T; Richter C; Burmeister H; Kaiser WA
    Rofo; 2011 Feb; 183(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 20830650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography].
    Sittek H; Kessler M; Heuck AF; Bredl T; Perlet C; Künzer I; Lebeau A; Untch M; Reiser M
    Rofo; 1997 Sep; 167(3):247-51. PubMed ID: 9376552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI of the breast as part of the assessment in population-based mammography screening.
    Bick U; Engelken F; Diederichs G; Dzyuballa R; Ortmann M; Fallenberg EM
    Rofo; 2013 Sep; 185(9):849-56. PubMed ID: 23740312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features.
    Stomper PC; Herman S; Klippenstein DL; Winston JS; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Mazurchuk RV; Blumenson LE
    Radiology; 1995 Nov; 197(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7480682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
    Kim JS; Lee SM; Cha ES
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
    Cilotti A; Iacconi C; Marini C; Moretti M; Mazzotta D; Traino C; Naccarato AG; Piagneri V; Giaconi C; Bevilacqua G; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
    Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
    Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Locally advanced breast cancer: comparison of mammography, sonography and MR imaging in evaluation of residual disease in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Londero V; Bazzocchi M; Del Frate C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C; Francescutti G; Zuiani C
    Eur Radiol; 2004 Aug; 14(8):1371-9. PubMed ID: 14986052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast].
    Winnekendonk G; Krug B; Warm M; Göhring UJ; Mallmann P; Lackner K
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 15122467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Targeted ultrasound for MR-detected lesions in breast cancer patients.
    Shin JH; Han BK; Choe YH; Ko K; Choi N
    Korean J Radiol; 2007; 8(6):475-83. PubMed ID: 18071277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Viehweg P; Lampe D; Buchmann J; Heywang-Köbrunner SH
    MAGMA; 2000 Dec; 11(3):129-37. PubMed ID: 11154954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
    Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the three-time-point method for diagnosis of breast lesions in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Hauth EA; Stockamp C; Maderwald S; Mühler A; Kimmig R; Jaeger H; Barkhausen J; Forsting M
    Clin Imaging; 2006; 30(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 16632149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Magnetic Resonance Female Breast Imaging (MRFBI) - Evaluation of the Changes in Signal Intensity over Time Pre- and Post-administration of 0.2 mmol/kg Gd-DTPA.
    Schedel H; Oellinger H; Kohlschein P; Siewert C; Hadijuana J; Blohmer JU; Kissner T; Felix R
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 2002 Feb; 124(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 11935495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.