204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15045522)
21. CE-Magnetic Resonance Mammography for the evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.
Pediconi F; Venditti F; Padula S; Roselli A; Moriconi E; Giacomelli L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2005; 110(1-2):61-8. PubMed ID: 16163140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI.
Gilles R; Meunier M; Lucidarme O; Zafrani B; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Le Gal M; Vanel D; Neuenschwander S; Arriagada R
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1996; 20(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 8576489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Preoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI can reduce the rate of tumor-positive resection margins after breast conserving surgery in patients with early non-mass breast carcinoma].
Li XS; Song YL; Li DC; Zhu HX; Meng LM; Huang RR; Wang SL; Wang D; Fang H; Fan HX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 39(10):768-774. PubMed ID: 29061022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. MR features to suggest microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: can it be differentiated from pure DCIS?
Hahn SY; Han BK; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hwang JY; Nam M
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):742-8. PubMed ID: 23588154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ.
Soderstrom CE; Harms SE; Copit DS; Evans WP; Savino DA; Krakos PA; Farrell RS; Flamig DP
Radiology; 1996 Nov; 201(2):427-32. PubMed ID: 8888235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical MR mammography: impact of hormonal status on background enhancement and diagnostic accuracy.
Baltzer PA; Dietzel M; Vag T; Burmeister H; Gajda M; Camara O; Pfleiderer SO; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2011 May; 183(5):441-7. PubMed ID: 21318935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of dynamic studies of MR mammography for the diagnosis of intraductal lesions with nipple discharge.
Ishikawa T; Momiyama N; Hamaguchi Y; Takeuchi M; Iwasawa T; Yoshida T; Shimada H
Breast Cancer; 2004; 11(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 15550848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Multiple enhancing lesions detected on dynamic helical computed tomography-mammography.
Nishino M; Hayakawa K; Yamamoto A; Nakamura Y; Morimoto T; Mukaihara S; Urata Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2003; 27(5):771-8. PubMed ID: 14501369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of lesion size estimated by dynamic MR imaging, mammography and histopathology in breast neoplasms.
Kristoffersen Wiberg M; Aspelin P; Sylvan M; Boné B
Eur Radiol; 2003 Jun; 13(6):1207-12. PubMed ID: 12764634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Role of breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with unilateral nipple discharge: preliminary study.
Ballesio L; Maggi C; Savelli S; Angeletti M; De Felice C; Meggiorini ML; Manganaro L; Porfiri LM
Radiol Med; 2008 Mar; 113(2):249-64. PubMed ID: 18386126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Breast cancer in dense breast: detection with contrast-enhanced dynamic MR imaging.
Kawashima H; Matsui O; Suzuki M; Kadoya M; Tawara M; Nonomura A; Noguchi M; Takashima T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Mar; 11(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 10739554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Value of MR tomography in inconclusive mammography findings].
Buchberger W; DeKoekkoek-Doll P; Obrist P; Dünser M
Radiologe; 1997 Sep; 37(9):702-9. PubMed ID: 9424615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast combined with pharmacokinetic analysis of gadolinium-DTPA uptake in the diagnosis of local recurrence of early stage breast carcinoma.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Bowsley SJ; Carleton PJ; Fox JN; Turnbull LW; Horsman A
Invest Radiol; 1995 Nov; 30(11):650-62. PubMed ID: 8557506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: MR imaging findings with histopathologic correlation.
Mossa-Basha M; Fundaro GM; Shah BA; Ali S; Pantelic MV
Radiographics; 2010 Oct; 30(6):1673-87. PubMed ID: 21071382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI reveals the extent and the microvascular pattern of breast ductal carcinoma in situ.
Santamaría G; Velasco M; Farrús B; Caparrós FX; Fernández PL
Breast J; 2013; 19(4):402-10. PubMed ID: 23758454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MRI findings of cancers preoperatively diagnosed as pure DCIS at core needle biopsy.
Huang YT; Cheung YC; Lo YF; Ueng SH; Kuo WL; Chen SC
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1064-8. PubMed ID: 21969708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer.
Ali-Mucheru M; Pockaj B; Patel B; Pizzitola V; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Gray R
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):649-655. PubMed ID: 27638679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach.
Fischer U; Kopka L; Grabbe E
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):881-8. PubMed ID: 10580970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
