These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15046034)

  • 1. Privacy rights and abortion outing: a proposal for using common-law torts to protect abortion patients and staff.
    Clapman A
    Yale Law J; 2003 Apr; 112(6):1545-76. PubMed ID: 15046034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consti-tortion: tort law as an end-run around abortion rights after Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Stone AJ
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2000; 8(2):471-515. PubMed ID: 16594110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fetal interests vs. maternal rights: is the state going too far?
    Trindel RM
    Akron Law Rev; 1991; 24(3-4):743-62. PubMed ID: 16273672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
    Gallagher A
    St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors.
    O'Shaughnessy M
    Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From conception until birth: exploring the maternal duty to protect fetal health.
    Cook M
    Wash Univ Law Q; 2002; 80(4):1307-40. PubMed ID: 15164743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. State constitutional privacy rights post Webster--broader protection against abortion restrictions?
    Ezzard MM
    Denver Univ Law Rev; 1990; 67(3):401-19. PubMed ID: 15999439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bioethics discovers the Bill of Rights.
    Veatch RM
    Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):11-3. PubMed ID: 16100834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lesbians and abortion.
    Robson R
    Rev Law Soc Change; 2011; 35(1):247-79. PubMed ID: 21774157
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Health care law.
    Mayo TW
    SMU Law Rev; 2003; 56(3):1767-82. PubMed ID: 12924424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions.
    Vanzi LM
    N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What "choice" do they have?: protecting pregnant minors' reproductive rights using state constitutions.
    Weissmann R
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1999; 1999(1):129-67. PubMed ID: 11958234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion rights after South Dakota.
    McDonagh E
    Free Inq; 2006; 26(4):34-8. PubMed ID: 16830439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physically Intrusive Abortion Restrictions as Fourth Amendment Searches and Seizures: A new conceptual avenue for challenging abortion restrictions.
    Harv Law Rev; 2015 Jan; 128(3):951-72. PubMed ID: 26793815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Whither the family and family privacy?
    Jones TR; Peterman L
    Tex Rev Law Polit; 1999; 4(1):193-236. PubMed ID: 15706723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion: issues of access, policy, rights continue to be tested.
    Bernstein AH
    Hospitals; 1980 Feb; 54(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 7351319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker and Hurwitz in the deck and defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Pepperdine Law Rev; 2003 May; 30(4):641-70. PubMed ID: 15237509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization.
    Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.